Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the impact of the G2 enhancer, bead sizes and lysing tubes on the bacterial community composition during DNA extraction from recalcitrant soil core samples based on community sequencing and qPCR
A. Gobbi, R. G. Santini, E. Filippi, L. Ellegaard-Jensen, C. S. Jacobsen, L. Hansen
Abstract
Soil DNA extraction encounters numerous challenges that can affect both yield and purity of the recovered DNA. Clay particles lead to reduced DNA extraction efficiency, and PCR inhibitors from the soil matrix can negatively affect downstream analyses when applying DNA sequencing. Further, these effects impede molecular analysis of bacterial community compositions in lower biomass samples, as often observed in deeper soil layers. Many studies avoid these complications by using indirect DNA extraction with prior separation of the cells from the matrix, but such methods introduce other biases that influence the resulting microbial community composition.\n\nTo address these issues, a direct DNA extraction method was applied in combination with the use of a commercial product, the G2 DNA/RNA Enhancer(R), marketed as being capable of improving the amount of DNA recovered after the lysis step. The results showed that application of G2 increased DNA yields from the studied clayey soils from layers between 1.00 and 2.20 m below ground level.\n\nImportantly, the use of G2 did not introduce bias, as it did not result in any significant differences in the biodiversity of the bacterial community measured in terms of alpha and beta diversity and taxonomical composition.\n\nFinally, this study considered a set of customised lysing tubes for evaluating possible influences on the DNA yield. Tubes customization included different bead sizes and amounts, along with lysing tubes coming from two suppliers. Results showed that the lysing tubes with mixed beads allowed greater DNA recovery compared to the use of either 0.1 or 1.4 mm beads, irrespective of the tube supplier.\n\nThese outcomes may help to improve commercial products in DNA/RNA extraction kits, besides raising awareness about the optimal choice of additives, offering opportunities for acquiring a better understanding of topics such as vertical microbial characterisation and environmental DNA recovery in low biomass samples.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A comparison of hard and soft direct methods for DNA extraction from soil
P. B. Hill, M. F. Dextraze, … C. N. Boddy·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2022
- Comparing DNA Extraction Protocols for Freshwater Prokaryotic Communities: Impacts on Yield and Microbial Profiling
Arthur Szylit, Ludwig E. Jardillier, … Urania Christaki·Peer Community JournalPeer-reviewed·Sep 18, 2026
- Scalable isolation of soil genomic DNA from microbes to multicellular micro- and mesofauna
Sannakajsa Velmala, Tero T. Tuomivirta, … Taina Pennanen·bioRxiv·Jan 17, 2026
- A simple, cost-effective and automation-friendly direct PCR approach for bacterial community analysis
F. Song, J. V. Kuehl, … A. P. Arkin·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2021
- Development and Refinement of Microbial DNA Extraction Protocol from Bovine Milk
Rowan Cook, Joana Lima, … Holly J. Ferguson·bioRxiv·May 1, 2026
- Impact of sequence variant detection and bacterial DNA extraction methods on the measurement of microbial community composition in human stool
Riley Hughes, Zeynep Alkan, … Mary E. Kable·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2017