bioRxivMicrobiology
Identifying mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and laboratory cross-contamination during Mycobacterial sequencing programs
D. H. Wyllie, E. Robinson, T. E. A. Peto, D. W. Crook, A. Ajileye, P. Rathod, R. Allen, L. Jarrett, E. G. Smith, A. S. Walker
Abstract
IntroductionDetecting laboratory cross-contamination and mixed tuberculosis infection are important goals of clinical Mycobacteriology laboratories.\n\nObjectivesTo develop a method detecting mixtures of different M. tuberculosis lineages in laboratories performing Mycobacterial next generation sequencing (NGS).\n\nSettingPublic Health England National Mycobacteriology Laboratory Birmingham, which performs Illumina sequencing on DNA extracted from positive Mycobacterial Growth Indicator tubes.\n\nMethodsWe analysed 4,156 samples yielding M. tuberculosis from 663 MiSeq runs, obtained during development and production use of a diagnostic process using NGS. Counts of the most common (major) variant, and all other variants (non-major variants) were determined from reads mapping to positions defining M. tuberculosis lineages. Expected variation was estimated during process development.\n\nResultsFor each sample we determined the non-major variant proportions at 55 sets of lineage defining positions. The non-major variant proportion in the two most mixed lineage defining sets (F2 metric) was compared with that in the 47 least mixed lineage defining sets (F47 metric). Three patterns were observed: (i) not mixed by either metric, (ii) high F47 metric suggesting mixtures of multiple lineages, and (iii) samples compatible with mixtures of two lineages, detected by differential F2 metric elevation relative to F47. Pattern (ii) was observed in batches, with similar patterns in the H37Rv control present in each run, and is likely to reflect cross-contamination. During production, the proportions of samples in each pattern were 97%, 2.8%, and 0.001%, respectively.\n\nConclusionThe F2 and F47 metrics described could be used for laboratory process control in laboratories sequencing M. tuberculosis.
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: batch correction / integration
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- M. tuberculosis microvariation is common and is associated with transmission: analysis of three years prospective universal sequencing in England
D. H. Wyllie, T. Do, … E. G. Smith·Journal of InfectionPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022
- A new method for detecting mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and reconstructing constituent strains provides insights into transmission
Benjamin Sobkowiak, Patrick Cudahy, … Ted Cohen·bioRxiv·Apr 26, 2024
- Control of artefactual variation in reported inter-sample relatedness during clinical use of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis sequencing pipeline
D. Wyllie, N. D. Sanderson, … A. S. Walker·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2018
- QuantTB - A method to classify mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infections within whole genome sequencing data
Christine Anyansi, Arlin Keo, … Thomas Abeel·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2020
- Genomic Sequencing from Sputum for Tuberculosis Disease Diagnosis, Lineage Determination and Drug Susceptibility Prediction
K. Nilgiriwala, M.-S. Rabodoarivelo, … T. M. Walker·bioRxiv·Oct 31, 2022
- Species and Genetic Diversity of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) in Suspected Tuberculosis Cases in East Azerbaijan, Iran: A Cross-sectional Analysis
Mehdi Roshdi Maleki·Frontiers in Cellular and Infection MicrobiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2024