Sign in
Molecular BiologyNucleic Acids Research
Peer-reviewed journal article

Dynamic interplay between RPL3- and RPL3L-containing ribosomes modulates mitochondrial activity in the mammalian heart

Ivan MilenkoviciD, Helaine Graziele Santos VieiraiD, Morghan C. LucasiD, Jorge Ruiz‐OreraiD, Giannino PatoneiD, Scott H. KesteveniD, Jianxin WuiD, Michael Patrick FeneleyiD, Guadalupe EspadasiD, Eduard SabidóiD, Norbert HübneriD, Sebastiaan van HeeschiD, Mirko VölkersiD, Eva Maria NovoaiD

Abstract

The existence of naturally occurring ribosome heterogeneity is now a well-acknowledged phenomenon. However, whether this heterogeneity leads to functionally diverse specialized ribosomes is still a controversial topic. Here, we explore the biological function of RPL3L (uL3L), a ribosomal protein (RP) paralog of RPL3 (uL3) that is exclusively expressed in muscle and heart tissues, by generating a viable homozygous Rpl3l knockout mouse strain. We identify a rescue mechanism in which, upon RPL3L depletion, RPL3 becomes upregulated, yielding RPL3-containing ribosomes instead of RPL3L-containing ribosomes that are typically found in cardiomyocytes. Using both ribosome profiling (Ribo-Seq) and a novel orthogonal approach consisting of ribosome pulldown coupled to nanopore sequencing (Nano-TRAP), we find that RPL3L neither modulates translational efficiency nor ribosome affinity towards a specific subset of transcripts. By contrast, we show that depletion of RPL3L leads to increased ribosome-mitochondria interactions in cardiomyocytes, which is accompanied by a significant increase in ATP levels, potentially as a result of mitochondrial activity fine-tuning. Our results demonstrate that the existence of tissue-specific RP paralogs does not necessarily lead to enhanced translation of specific transcripts or modulation of translational output. Instead, we reveal a complex cellular scenario in which RPL3L modulates the expression of RPL3, which in turn affects ribosomal subcellular localization and, ultimately, mitochondrial activity.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
54
FWCI
4.79
Field percentile
top 3%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.