Investigating the impact of database choice on the accuracy of metagenomic read classification for the rumen microbiome
Rebecca H. SmithiD, Laura GlendinningiD, Alan W. WalkeriD, Mick WatsoniD
Abstract
Microbiome analysis is quickly moving towards high-throughput methods such as metagenomic sequencing. Accurate taxonomic classification of metagenomic data relies on reference sequence databases, and their associated taxonomy. However, for understudied environments such as the rumen microbiome many sequences will be derived from novel or uncultured microbes that are not present in reference databases. As a result, taxonomic classification of metagenomic data from understudied environments may be inaccurate. To assess the accuracy of taxonomic read classification, this study classified metagenomic data that had been simulated from cultured rumen microbial genomes from the Hungate collection. To assess the impact of reference databases on the accuracy of taxonomic classification, the data was classified with Kraken 2 using several reference databases. We found that the choice and composition of reference database significantly impacted on taxonomic classification results, and accuracy. In particular, NCBI RefSeq proved to be a poor choice of database. Our results indicate that inaccurate read classification is likely to be a significant problem, affecting all studies that use insufficient reference databases. We observe that adding cultured reference genomes from the rumen to the reference database greatly improves classification rate and accuracy. We also demonstrate that metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) have the potential to further enhance classification accuracy by representing uncultivated microbes, sequences of which would otherwise be unclassified or incorrectly classified. However, classification accuracy was strongly dependent on the taxonomic labels assigned to these MAGs. We therefore highlight the importance of accurate reference taxonomic information and suggest that, with formal taxonomic lineages, MAGs have the potential to improve classification rate and accuracy, particularly in environments such as the rumen that are understudied or contain many novel genomes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 55
- FWCI
- 3.27
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Manually weighted taxonomy classifiers improve species-specific rumen microbiome analysis compared to unweighted or average weighted taxonomy classifiers
Ryukseok Kang, Zhongtang Yu, … Tansol Park·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 4, 2025
- From defaults to databases: parameter and database choice dramatically impact the performance of metagenomic taxonomic classification tools
Robyn Wright, A. Comeau, Morgan G. I. Langille·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2023
- Correcting index databases improves metagenomic studies
Guillaume Méric, Ryan R. Wick, … Michael Inouye·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2019
- MT-MAG: Accurate and interpretable machine learning for complete or partial taxonomic assignments of metagenome-assembled genomes
Wanxin Li, Lila Kari A, … Laura A. Hug·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2022
- MetaMAG Explorer: A Database-Augmenting Pipeline for Genome-Resolved Metagenomics and Enhanced Microbial Classification
Maria Altaf Satti, Zexi Cai·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2026
- CCMetagen: comprehensive and accurate identification of eukaryotes and prokaryotes in metagenomic data
Vanessa R. Marcelino, Philip T. L. C. Clausen, … Edward Charles Holmes·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2020