CCMetagen: comprehensive and accurate identification of eukaryotes and prokaryotes in metagenomic data
Vanessa R. MarcelinoiD, Philip T. L. C. ClauseniD, Jan P. BuchmanniD, Michelle WilleiD, Jonathan R. IredelliD, Wieland MeyeriD, Ole LundiD, Tania Christine SorrelliD, Edward Charles HolmesiD
Abstract
High-throughput sequencing of DNA and RNA from environmental and host-associated samples (metagenomics and metatranscriptomics) is a powerful tool to assess which organisms are present in a sample. Taxonomic identification software usually align individual short sequence reads to a reference database, sometimes containing taxa with complete genomes only. This is a challenging task given that different species can share identical sequence regions and complete genome sequences are only available for a fraction of organisms. A recently developed approach to map sequence reads to reference databases involves weighing all high scoring read-mappings to the data base as a whole to produce better-informed alignments. We used this novel concept in read mapping to develop a highly accurate metagenomic classification pipeline named CCMetagen. Using simulated fungal and bacterial metagenomes, we demonstrate that CCMetagen substantially outperforms other commonly used metagenome classifiers, attaining a 3 - 1580 fold increase in precision and a 2 - 922 fold increase in F1 scores for species-level classifications when compared to Kraken2, Centrifuge and KrakenUniq. CCMetagen is sufficiently fast and memory efficient to use the entire NCBI nucleotide collection (nt) as reference, enabling the assessment of species with incomplete genome sequence data from all biological kingdoms. Our pipeline efficiently produced a comprehensive overview of the microbiome of two biological data sets, including both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. CCMetagen is user-friendly and the results can be easily integrated into microbial community analysis software for streamlined and automated microbiome studies.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 186
- FWCI
- 7.86
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- From defaults to databases: parameter and database choice dramatically impact the performance of metagenomic taxonomic classification tools
Robyn Wright, A. Comeau, Morgan G. I. Langille·Microbial GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2023
- MT-MAG: Accurate and interpretable machine learning for complete or partial taxonomic assignments of metagenome-assembled genomes
Wanxin Li, Lila Kari A, … Laura A. Hug·bioRxiv·Jan 12, 2022
- A comparative study of metagenomics analysis pipelines at the species level
Yee Voan Teo, Nicola Neretti·bioRxiv·Oct 15, 2016
- Investigating the impact of database choice on the accuracy of metagenomic read classification for the rumen microbiome
Rebecca H. Smith, Laura Glendinning, … Mick Watson·Animal MicrobiomePeer-reviewed·Nov 18, 2022
- Comprehensive benchmarking of metagenomic classification tools for long-read sequencing data
Josip Marić, Krešimir Križanović, … Mile Šikić·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 11, 2024
- Comprehensive Benchmarking and Ensemble Approaches for Metagenomic Classifiers
Alexa B. R. McIntyre, Rachid Ounit, … Christopher E. Mason·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2017