Sign in
BioinformaticsGenome biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

CCMetagen: comprehensive and accurate identification of eukaryotes and prokaryotes in metagenomic data

Vanessa R. MarcelinoiD, Philip T. L. C. ClauseniD, Jan P. BuchmanniD, Michelle WilleiD, Jonathan R. IredelliD, Wieland MeyeriD, Ole LundiD, Tania Christine SorrelliD, Edward Charles HolmesiD

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing of DNA and RNA from environmental and host-associated samples (metagenomics and metatranscriptomics) is a powerful tool to assess which organisms are present in a sample. Taxonomic identification software usually align individual short sequence reads to a reference database, sometimes containing taxa with complete genomes only. This is a challenging task given that different species can share identical sequence regions and complete genome sequences are only available for a fraction of organisms. A recently developed approach to map sequence reads to reference databases involves weighing all high scoring read-mappings to the data base as a whole to produce better-informed alignments. We used this novel concept in read mapping to develop a highly accurate metagenomic classification pipeline named CCMetagen. Using simulated fungal and bacterial metagenomes, we demonstrate that CCMetagen substantially outperforms other commonly used metagenome classifiers, attaining a 3 - 1580 fold increase in precision and a 2 - 922 fold increase in F1 scores for species-level classifications when compared to Kraken2, Centrifuge and KrakenUniq. CCMetagen is sufficiently fast and memory efficient to use the entire NCBI nucleotide collection (nt) as reference, enabling the assessment of species with incomplete genome sequence data from all biological kingdoms. Our pipeline efficiently produced a comprehensive overview of the microbiome of two biological data sets, including both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. CCMetagen is user-friendly and the results can be easily integrated into microbial community analysis software for streamlined and automated microbiome studies.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
186
FWCI
7.86
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWright '23Li '22Teo '16Smith '22Marić '24McIntyre '17
70% semantic matchBioinformatics
Robyn Wright, A. Comeau, Morgan G. I. Langille·Microbial Genomics·Mar 3, 2023· 76 citations