The contribution of Neanderthal introgression and natural selection to neurodegenerative diseases
Zhongbo CheniD, Regina Hertfelder ReynoldsiD, Antonio F. PardiñasiD, Sarah A. Gagliano TaliuniD, Wouter van RheeneniD, Kuang Lin, Aleksey ShatunoviD, Emil Karl GustavssoniD, Isabella FoghiD, Ashley R. Jones, Wim Robberecht, Philippe CorciaiD, Adriano ChiòiD, Pamela J. ShawiD, Karen E. MorrisoniD, Jan Herman VeldinkiD, Leonard H. van den BergiD, Christopher E. ShawiD, John F. PowelliD, Vincenzo SilaniiD, John HardyiD, Henry HouldeniD, Michael John OweniD, Martin R. TurneriD, Mina RyteniD, Ammar Al‐ChalabiiD
Abstract
Humans are thought to be more susceptible to neurodegeneration than equivalently-aged primates. It is not known whether this vulnerability is specific to anatomically-modern humans or shared with other hominids. The contribution of introgressed Neanderthal DNA to neurodegenerative disorders remains uncertain. It is also unclear how common variants associated with neurodegenerative disease risk are maintained by natural selection in the population despite their deleterious effects. In this study, we aimed to quantify the genome-wide contribution of Neanderthal introgression and positive selection to the heritability of complex neurodegenerative disorders to address these questions. We used stratified-linkage disequilibrium score regression to investigate the relationship between five SNP-based signatures of natural selection, reflecting different timepoints of evolution, and genome-wide associated variants of the three most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders: Alzheimers disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsons disease. We found no evidence for enrichment of positively-selected SNPs in the heritability of Alzheimers disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinsons disease,, suggesting that common deleterious disease variants are unlikely to be maintained by positive selection. There was no enrichment of Neanderthal introgression in the SNP-heritability of these disorders, suggesting that Neanderthal admixture is unlikely to have contributed to disease risk. These findings provide insight into the origins of neurodegenerative disorders within the evolution of Homo sapiens and addresses a long-standing debate, showing that Neanderthal admixture is unlikely to have contributed to common genetic risk of neurodegeneration in anatomically-modern humans.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Field percentile
- top 27%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits
E. McArthur, D. C. Rinker, J. A. Capra·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2020
- The lingering effects of Neanderthal introgression on human complex traits
Xinzhu Wei, Christopher R. Robles, … Sriram Sankararaman·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 20, 2023
- Effects of introgressed Neanderthal alleles on present-day brain morphology
Roberta Zeloni, Alessandro Amaolo, … Davide Marnetto·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2026
- Bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis of shared genetic signals between coexisting neurodegenerative disorders to decipher underlying causal pathways
Sandeep Grover·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2019
- Genetic risk factor clustering within and across neurodegenerative diseases
Mathew J. Koretsky, Chelsea X. Alvarado, … Hampton L. Leonard·BrainPeer-reviewed·May 16, 2023
- The genetic overlap between Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Lewy body dementia, and Parkinson's disease
Douglas P. Wightman, Jeanne E. Savage, … Daniëlle Posthuma·Neurobiology of AgingPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2023