The impact of genetic risk for Alzheimers disease on the structural brain networks of young adults
Anastasia Mirza-DaviesiD, Sonya F. FoleyiD, Xavier CaserasiD, Emily Ann Baker, Peter HolmansiD, Valentina Escott‐PriceiD, Derek Kenton JonesiD, Judith Rose HarrisoniD, Eirini MessaritakiiD
Abstract
We investigated the structural brain networks of 562 young adults in relation to polygenic risk for Alzheimers disease, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and genotype data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Diffusion MRI data were used to perform whole-brain tractography and to generate structural brain networks for the whole-brain connectome, and for the default mode, limbic and visual subnetworks. The mean clustering coefficient, mean betweenness centrality, characteristic path length, global efficiency and mean nodal strength were calculated for these networks, for each participant. The connectivity of the rich-club, feeder and local connections was also calculated. Polygenic risk scores (PRS), estimating each participants genetic risk, were calculated at genome-wide level and for nine specific disease pathways. Correlations were calculated between the PRS and a) the graph theoretical metrics of the structural networks and b) the rich-club, feeder and local connectivity of the whole-brain networks. In the visual subnetwork, the mean nodal strength was negatively correlated with the genomewide PRS (r=-0.19, p=1.3x10-5), the mean betweenness centrality was positively correlated with the plasma lipoprotein particle assembly PRS (r=0.16, p=9.2x10-4), and the mean clustering coefficient was negatively correlated with the tau protein binding PRS (r=-0.16, p=9.2x10-4). In the default mode network, the mean nodal strength was negatively correlated with the genomewide PRS (r=-0.14, p=1.5x10-3). The rich-club and feeder connectivities were negatively correlated with the genome-wide PRS (r=-0.16, p=3.7x10-4; r=-0.15, p=8.8x10-4). Our results indicate small reductions in brain connectivity in young adults at risk of developing Alzheimers disease in later life.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 1.29
- Field percentile
- top 22%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Relating Global and Local Connectome Changes to Dementia and Targeted Gene Expression in Alzheimer's Disease
Samar S. M. Elsheikh, Emile Rugamika Chimusa, … Alessandro Crimi·Frontiers in Human NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2021
- Exploratory Correlation of the Human Structural Connectome with Non-MRI Variables in Alzheimer's Disease
Iman Aganj, Jocelyn Mora, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease MonitoringPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2023
- Dementia risk factors modify hubs but leave other connectivity measures unchanged in asymptomatic individuals: a graph theoretical analysis.
Hannah J Lucas-Clarke, Eirini Messaritaki, … Claudia Metzler‐Baddeley·Brain ConnectivityPeer-reviewed·May 25, 2021
- Graph analysis of structural brain networks in Alzheimer’s disease
Majnu John, Toshikazu Ikuta, Janina D Ferbinteanu·Brain Structure and FunctionPeer-reviewed·Jun 29, 2016
- Vulnerable Brain Networks Associated with Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Ali Mahzarnia, Jacques Andrew Stout, … Alexandra Badea·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2022
- Association of Whole-Person Eigen-Polygenic Risk Scores with Alzheimer's Disease
Amin Kharaghani, Earvin S. Tio, … Daniel Felsky·Human Molecular GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 27, 2024