Spatial Sorting of Soft and Stiff Bacteria in the Human Colon
Abstract
The spatial organization of intestinal microbiota is shaped by biochemical signals, host factors and physical forces. While chemical gradients and host immunity are well studied, the influence of mechanical properties is underexplored. Drawing on soft matter physics and microbiome research, we combined atomic force microscopy data with gut-like flow simulations to investigate whether bacterial stiffness influences spatial organization and mechanical/hydrodynamic responses. Indeed, colonic bacteria differ markedly in stiffness: soft species like Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli and Akkermansia muciniphila display thin peptidoglycan layers and flexible outer membranes, while stiff species like Clostridium difficile, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Enterococcus faecalis and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii display greater rigidity linked to thick Gram-positive cell walls. Our simulations showed that mechanical compliance can drive spatial partitioning under laminar shear, with soft bacteria localizing near the mucosal surfaces and stiff bacteria aligning along central flow paths. Further, soft bacteria aligned more quickly with shear flow, migrated more efficiently toward the lumen center, dissipated more energy during collisions and detached more readily from mucosal surfaces. Soft bacteria also formed slower, more diffuse biofilms and exhibited greater displacement under peristaltic compression. This suggests that stiffness, independent of chemical signalling, may shape microbial localization, interaction, organization and persistence in gut-like environments. Stiffness may serve as non-chemical, precision tool for microbiome modulation, paving the way for targeted, mechanically informed interventions. This approach could enable applications like stiffness-guided drug delivery to specific gut regions, selective removal of stiff pathogenic bacteria using mechanical cues and mechanical pre-sorting of microbial populations for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Emergent spatial structure in the gut microbiota is driven by bacterial growth and gut contractions
Giorgia Greter, Sebastian Hummel, … Markus Arnoldini·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 24, 2026
- Physical confinement selectively favours bacterial growth based on cell shape
M. Sreepadmanabh, Meenakshi Ganesh, … Tapomoy Bhattacharjee·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2024
- Bacterial cohesion predicts spatial distribution in the larval zebrafish intestine
B. H. Schlomann, T. J. Wiles, … R. Parthasarathy·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2018
- Fluid flow structures gut microbiota biofilm communities by distributing public goods
J. P. H. Wong, M. Fischer-Stettler, … A. Persat·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2022
- Bacteria colonies modify their shear and compressive mechanical properties in response to different growth substrates
J. A. Kochanowski, B. Carroll, … A. E. Patteson·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2023
- The influence of cell morphology on the dynamics and stability of model bacterial communities
Ing Xhu Lim, Faisal Halabeya, Joshua N. Milstein·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2026