Population effect of influenza vaccination under co-circulation of non-vaccine variants and the case for a multi-strain A/H3N2 vaccine component
Colin J Worby, Jacco Wallinga, Marc Lipsitch, Edward Goldstein
Abstract
Some past epidemics of different influenza (sub)types (particularly A/H3N2) in the US saw co-circulation of vaccine-type and variant strains. There is evidence that natural infection with one influenza (sub)type offers short-term protection against infection with another influenza (sub)type (henceforth, cross-immunity). This suggests that such cross-immunity for strains within a (sub)type is expected to be strong. Therefore, while vaccination effective against one strain may reduce transmission of that strain, this may also lead to a reduction of the ability of the vaccine-type strain to suppress spread of a variant strain. It remains unclear what the joint effect of vaccination and cross-immunity is for co-circulating influenza strains, and what is the potential benefit of a bivalent vaccine that protects against both strains.\n\nWe simulated co-circulation of vaccine-type and variant strains under a variety of scenarios. In each scenario, we considered the case when the vaccine efficacy against the variant strain is lower than the efficacy against the vaccine-type strain (monovalent vaccine), as well the case when vaccine is equally efficacious against both strains (bivalent vaccine).\n\nAdministration of a bivalent vaccine results in a significant reduction in the overall incidence of infection compared to administration of a monovalent vaccine, even with lower coverage by the bivalent vaccine. Additionally, we found that the stronger is the degree of cross-immunity, the less beneficial is the increase in coverage levels for the monovalent vaccine, and the more beneficial is the introduction of the bivalent vaccine.\n\nOur work exhibits the limitations of influenza vaccines that have low efficacy against non-vaccine strains, and demonstrates the benefits of vaccines that offer good protection against multiple influenza strains. The results elucidate the need for guarding against the potential co-circulation of non-vaccine strains for an influenza (sub)type, at least during select seasons, possibly through inclusion of multiple strains within a (sub)type (particularly A/H3N2) in a vaccine.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cross-protective immune responses induced by sequential influenza virus infection and by sequential vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccines
W. Dong, Y. Bhide, … A. Huckriede·bioRxiv·May 31, 2018
- Vaccine-elicitation of cross-group neutralizing protective antibodies to influenza A viruses
S. M. Moin, J. C. Boyington, … M. Kanekiyo·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2022
- Immunogen selection and prior immunity shape antibody breadth following immunisation with avian H5 hemagglutinin
Yee‐Chen Liu, Andrew Kelly, … Adam K. Wheatley·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2026
- A single cycle influenza virus coated in H7 hemagglutinin provides heterotypic protection and neutralising antibody responses to both glycoproteins.
T. J. Powell, P. Rijal, … A. R. M. Townsend·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2017
- Strain-specific differences in the response to egg-derived versus recombinant protein influenza vaccines
Andrea N. Loes, Rosario Araceli L Tarabi, … Jesse D. Bloom·Journal of VirologyPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- Concurrent administration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccines enhances Spike-specific antibody responses
S. E. Barouch, T. M. Chicz, … R. P. McNamara·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2023