DatabaseBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Characterization and automated classification of sentences in the biomedical literature: a case study for biocuration of gene expression and protein kinase activity
Daniela RacitiiD, Kimberly M. Van AukeniD, Valerio ArnaboldiiD, Christopher J. TaboneiD, Hans-Michael MulleriD, Paul W. SternbergiD
Abstract
Biological knowledgebases are essential resources for biomedical researchers, providing ready access to gene function and genomic data. Professional, manual curation of knowledgebases, however, is labor-intensive and thus high-performing machine learning methods that improve biocuration efficiency are needed. Here we report on sentence-level classification to identify biocuration-relevant sentences in the full text of published references for two gene function data types: gene expression and protein kinase activity. We performed a detailed characterization of sentences from references in the WormBase bibliography and used this characterization to define three tasks for classifying sentences as either 1) fully curatable, 2) fully and partially curatable, or 3) all language-related. We evaluated various machine learning (ML) models applied to these tasks and found that GPT and BioBERT achieve the highest average performance, resulting in F1 performance scores ranging from 0.89 to 0.99 depending upon the task. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of extracting biocuration-relevant sentences from full text. Integrating these models into professional biocuration workflows, such as those used by the Alliance of Genome Resources and the ACKnowledge community curation platform, might well facilitate efficient and accurate annotation of the biomedical literature.
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: clustering
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Field percentile
- top 23%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Re-curation and Rational Enrichment of Knowledge Graphs in Biological Expression Language
Charles Tapley Hoyt, Daniel Domingo‐Fernándéz, … Martin Hofmann‐Apitius·DatabasePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- Taking a Dive: Experiments in Deep Learning for Automatic Ontology-based Annotation of Scientific Literature
Prashanti Manda, Lucas Beasley, Somya D. Mohanty·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2018
- BELL: Biomodel Evidence and LLM-based Logic
Niloofar Arazkhani, Brent Cochran, Nataša Miškov-Živanov·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2026
- On expert curation and sustainability: UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot as a case study
Sylvain Poux, Cecilia N. Arighi, … Bernd Roechert·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2016
- BioAct: Biomedical Knowledge Base Construction using Active Learning
Dustin Wright, Anna Lisa Gentile, … Kristen L. Beck·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2022
- Optimising biomedical relationship extraction with BioBERT: Best practices for data creation
Oliver Giles, Anneli Karlsson, … JAMES M. MALONE·bioRxiv·Sep 1, 2020