bioRxivMicrobiology
Mismatch repair hierarchy of Pseudomonas putida revealed by mutagenic ssDNA recombineering of the pyrF gene
V. de Lorenzo, E. Martinez-Garcia, I. Nagy, C. Pal, A. Nyerges, T. Aparicio
Abstract
The mismatch repair (MMR) system is one of the key molecular devices that prokaryotic cells have for ensuring fidelity of DNA replication. While the canonical MMR of E. coli involves 3 proteins (encoded by mutS, mutL and mutH), the soil bacterium Pseudomonads putida has only 2 bona fide homologues (mutS and mutL) and the sensitivity of this abridged system to different types of mismatches is unknown. On this background, sensitivity to MMR of this bacterium was inspected through single stranded (ss) DNA recombineering of the pyrF gene (the prokaryotic equivalent to yeasts URA3) with mutagenic oligos representative of every possible mispairing under either wild-type conditions, permanent deletion of mutS or transient loss of mutL activity (brought about by the thermoinducible dominant negative allele mutLE36K). Analysis of single nucleotide mutations borne by clones resistant to fluoroorotic acid (5FOA, the target of wild type PyrF) pinpointed prohibited and tolerated single-nucleotide replacements and exposed a clear grading of mismatch recognition. The resulting data unequivocally established the hierarchy A:G< C:C< G:A< C:A, A:A, G:G, T:T, T:G, A:C, C:T< G:T, T:C as the one prevalent in Pseudomonas putida. This information was vital for enabling recombineering strategies aimed at single-nucleotide changes in this biotechnologically important species.\n\nOriginality-Significance StatementSingle-stranded DNA (ssDNA) recombineering has emerged in recent years as one of the most powerful technologies of genome editing in E. coli and other Enterobacteria. However, the efforts to expand the concept and the methods towards environmental microorganisms such as Pseudomonas putida have been limited thus far by several gaps in our fundamental knowledge of how nucleotide mismatch repair (MMR) operates in such non-model species. One critical bottleneck is the hierarchy of recognition of different types of base mispairings as well as the need of setting up strategies for counteracting MMR and thus enabling tolerance to all types of changes. The work presented here tackles both issues and makes P. putida amenable to sophisticated genetic manipulations that were impossible before.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High-efficiency multi-site genomic editing (HEMSE) of Pseudomonas putida through thermoinducible ssDNA recombineering
T. Aparicio, A. Nyerges, … V. de Lorenzo·bioRxiv·Nov 21, 2019
- Spatiotemporal manipulation of the mismatch repair system of Pseudomonas putida accelerates phenotype emergence
Lorena Fernández‐Cabezón, Antonin Cros, Pablo I. Nikel·ACS Synthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2021
- Mycobacterium smegmatis NucS-promoted DNA Mismatch Repair involves limited resection by a 5'-3' exonuclease and is independent of homologous recombination and NHEJ
Iris V. Rivera, Emily X Wang, Kenan C. Murphy·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 17, 2024
- Comparison of phage-derived recombinases for genetic manipulation of Pseudomonas species
Madison J. Kalb, Andrew W. Grenfell, … Jeffrey A. Gralnick·Microbiology SpectrumPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2023
- Massively parallel single molecule tracking of sequence-dependent DNA mismatch repair in vivo
T. Kayikcioglu, J. S. Zarb, … T. Ha·bioRxiv·Jan 8, 2023
- A novel DNA binding mode, conformational change and intramolecular signaling in MutS upon mismatch recognition in replication DNA structures
M. I. Ibanez, L. M. Margara, … M. R. Monti·bioRxiv·May 1, 2020