Trade-off between foraging and vigilance in the Red-legged Seriema
Lotte Schroth, Leonardo Esteves LopesiD, Filipe C. R. CunhaiD
Abstract
As foraging increases exposure to predators, individuals must allocate time to vigilance in addition to food acquisition. Although those behaviors are assumed to be mutually exclusive, this is often hard to disentangle, given that multiple sensory modalities are often applied. However, when foraging, animals often have one sensory modality more impaired (e.g. vision), than others (e.g. auditory); thus, a level of compromise on vigilance capabilities is assumed while foraging. Here, we test the idea that when a food item requires manipulation, thus reducing vigilance capabilities, social foraging should promote shared costs of vigilance. We conducted video recordings to investigate whether there is a trade-off between foraging and vigilance behavior in red-legged seriemas (Cariama cristata) when foraging in pairs. We studied the social foraging behavioral patterns while seriemas were feeding on macauba palm (Acrocomia aculeata) fruit, which requires a series of throwing maneuvers to crack the hard outer shell. Our results showed that within a pair recording one individual was observed to spend more time vigilant than their partner, while the other individual spent more time throwing fruit than their partner. However, we found no evidence for synchronization or coordination of vigilance and foraging between individuals within a feeding bout. These results provide insight into the foraging ecology of red-legged seriemas and the trade-off between foraging and vigilance in social contexts.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Barbary ground squirrels do not have a sentinel system but instead synchronise vigilance
A. van der Marel, J. M. Waterman, M. Lopez-Darias·bioRxiv·Apr 24, 2020
- Can't win, don't try: handling time costs affect foraging choices and vigilance in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)
Ajay Singh Kang, Wilson Mutebi, Julie Annette Teichroeb·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026
- Effort cost of harvest affects decisions and movement vigor of marmosets during foraging
Paul Hage, In Kyu Jang, … Reza Shadmehr·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2023
- Revealing complex relationships between sex, individuals' phenotype variation and social signalling in foraging strategies
Ana V. Leitão, Caterina Funghi, Paulo Gama Mota·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2024
- Foraging behavior across paths that vary in risk cues and frequency of occurrence
E. K. Lessig, P. Nonacs·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2019
- Social network centrality predicts dietary decisions in a wild bird population
K. McMahon, N. M. Marples, … J. A. Firth·bioRxiv·Aug 25, 2023