bioRxivAnimal Behavior & CognitionPreprint
Can't win, don't try: handling time costs affect foraging choices and vigilance in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus)
Abstract
Resource handling time is an important cost to foraging animals and this is especially true for low-ranking individuals who may be displaced before they acquire rewards. Handling may also require visual attention that can lead to a trade-off between scanning the environment and focusing on food acquisition. We ran a foraging experiment on wild vervet monkeys where we simultaneously offered them three puzzle boxes in a straight-line array that increased sequentially in handling difficulty and reward value. We found that differences in competitive ability had a large impact on access to long-handling time resources and willingness to invest time in costly problem-solving when social interference was possible. Resources with lower handling time and smaller rewards were accessed by individuals of all dominance ranks but only dominant monkeys that did not fear displacement attempted the high handling time puzzle box. Handling time improved with experience at each puzzle box and contrary to predictions, when vigilance rates were higher, monkeys were also faster at solving puzzle boxes. Thus, there is not necessarily a trade-off between attention to foraging tasks that require handling and vigilance, if a high scanning frequency to both can be balanced with limited scanning duration. These results have important implications for understanding the decision-making of foraging animals that live in competitive groups and the diets of individuals, which may vary with dominance when important resources require long handling times.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effort cost of harvest affects decisions and movement vigor of marmosets during foraging
Paul Hage, In Kyu Jang, … Reza Shadmehr·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 5, 2023
- Trade-off between foraging and vigilance in the Red-legged Seriema
Lotte Schroth, Leonardo Esteves Lopes, Filipe C. R. Cunha·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2026
- Worth the work? Monkeys discount rewards by a subjective adapting effort cost
Mark Burrell, Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Wolfram Schultz·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2023
- Resourceful mice do not starve: feeding efforts and decision-making process under a restricted unknown food source
M. Hernandez, A. Navarro-Castilla, I. Barja·bioRxiv·Feb 11, 2019
- Temporal Structure of Reward Availability and Sensory Uncertainty Modulate Allocation Dynamics in Naturalistic Foraging
Panos Alefantis, Yaxin Guo, … Najib J. Majaj·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2026
- Information gathering explains decision dynamics during human and monkey reward foraging
D. L. Barack, F. Parodi, … M. L. Platt·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2023