Canine oral melanoma genomic and transcriptomic study defines two molecular subgroups with different therapeutical targets
A. Prouteau, S. Mottier, A. Primot, E. Cadieu, L. Bachelot, N. Botherel, F. Cabilic, A. Houel, L. Cornevin, C. Kergal, S. Corre, J. Abadie, C. Hitte, D. Gilot, K. Lindblad-Toh, C. Andre, T. Derrien, B. Hedan
Abstract
Mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare and aggressive clinical cancer that occurs mostly in the head, neck, and anogenital regions. Despite recent advances in genetics and the development of revolutionary treatments, such as immunotherapy, the prognosis for MM remains poor. Canine MM shares several clinical, histological, and genetic features with its human counterpart, offering a relevant spontaneous and immunocompetent model to decipher the genetic bases and explore treatment options for human MM. We performed an integrative genomic and transcriptomic analysis of 32 canine MM samples, which allowed us to identify two molecular subgroups differing in microenvironment and structural variant (SV) content. The overexpression of genes related to the microenvironment and T-cell response was associated with tumors harboring a lower content of structural variants, whereas the overexpression of pigmentation-related pathways and oncogenes such as TERT were associated with a high SV burden. To detail the SVs, especially those with focal amplifications, whole-genome sequencing was performed on four canine MM cell lines. We showed that focal amplifications characterized complex chromosomal rearrangements targeting oncogenes such as MDM2 or CDK4 and a recurrently amplified region on canine chromosome 30, comprising the genes TRPM7, GABPB1, USP8, and SPPL2A, were candidate oncogenes for MM. We showed that the copy numbers of these genes were significantly correlated with their expression levels. Finally, we demonstrated that the genes TRPM7, GABPB1, and SPPL2A play a role in cell proliferation; thus, these may be considered new candidate oncogenes for human MM. Our findings suggest the existence of two MM molecular subgroups that may benefit from dedicated therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapies. These results illustrate the relevance of dog models for deciphering genetic mechanisms in spontaneous MM, along with the potential to screen for efficient targeted therapies for rare and aggressive cancers in humans.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Somatic inactivating PTPRJ mutations and dysregulated pathways identified in canine melanoma by integrated comparative genomic analysis
W. P. D. Hendricks, V. Zismann, … J. Trent·bioRxiv·Sep 30, 2017
- Lymph-node transcriptomics define prognostic immune states in mucosal melanoma and reveal IBA1 as a practical biomarker for improved prognosis
Angus Lane, Laura Blackwood, … Kelly Bowlt Blacklock·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2025
- The caninized anti-canine PD-1 monoclonal antibody in canine oral malignant melanoma: Efficacy and exploratory biomarker analysis
Masaya Igase, Kenji Hagimori, … Takuya Mizuno·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2025
- Genomic classification and immune profiling define mucosal melanoma
Yingxiao Shi, Priyanka Sharma, … Genevieve Marie Boland·bioRxiv·Oct 16, 2026
- Specific oncogene activation of the cell of origin in mucosal melanoma
Swathy Babu, Jiajia Chen, … Megan L. Insco·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2025
- A 16-colour spectral flow cytometry panel to characterise T cell immunophenotypes in canine oral melanoma
Esther Hindriks, Estefanía Lozano−Andrés, … Femke Broere·bioRxiv·Aug 28, 2026