A moving target: non-stationary selection governs unsupervised prediction of viral fitness
Abstract
Anticipating how mutations change viral fitness is central to genomic surveillance and vaccine design. However, the phenotypic data behind the most accurate supervised variant-effect predictors is unavailable for most emerging pathogens. It is therefore unclear how a label-free, unsupervised approach would perform using only sequences, their evolutionary history, and their protein structure. To address this outstanding question, we assemble a modular, fully unsupervised pipeline that estimates key interpretable terms: intrinsic replicative fitness, antigenic escape, and realized growth. Each term is produced by more than one estimator, so that the fitness predictor becomes a testable model choice. Benchmarking the intrinsic term on 21 viral deep-mutational-scanning assays from ProteinGym, we find that a 650-million-parameter single-sequence protein language model (PLM) is a weak predictor of viral fitness, whereas a simple site-independent alignment model more than doubles performance, with the largest gains obtained for the antigenic surface proteins not included in the training of the PLM. On the other hand, PMLs based on protein alignment (MSA Transformer, Tranception) regain the accuracy lost with the single-sequence PML, but do not significantly exceed the simple alignment. Therefore, the most important feature to predict viral fitness is the protein alignment, not model scale or architecture. Our central result is evolutionary: using dated sequences of SARS-CoV-2 spike and influenza H3N2 hemagglutinin, we find that the epoch of the alignment is itself a virus-specific determinant of accuracy. This demonstrates that selection is a non-stationary process, in a manner that is itself virus-specific. A phylogenetic mutation-selection estimator of fitness does not match the far simpler and less computationally expensive alignment model. Altogether, this work shows that unsupervised viral fitness prediction is as much an evolutionary problem as a modeling one.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A diffusion model of viral evolution predicts mutation fitness and evolutionary trajectories
Jinghan Wu, xiao ding, Aiping Wu·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- A Protein Language Model for Exploring Viral Fitness Landscapes
Jumpei Ito, Adam Patrick Strange, … Kei Sato·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 13, 2025
- Evaluating variant effect prediction across viruses
Sarah F. Gurev, Noor Youssef, … Debora S. Marks·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2025
- How to select the best zero-shot model for the viral proteins?
Yuanxi Yu, Fan Jiang, … Mingchen Li·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2024
- Forecasting viral evolution from phylogenetic trees
Ivan Specht, Soyoon Park, … Brian Hie·bioRxiv·Sep 5, 2026
- Concepts and methods for predicting viral evolution
Matthijs Meijers, Denis Ruchnewitz, … Michael Lässig·bioRxiv·Mar 19, 2024