Sign in
EcologybioRxiv

Anthropogenic remediation of heavy metals selects against natural microbial remediation

E. Hesse, D. Padfield, F. Bayer, E. M. Van Veen, C. G. Bryan, A. Buckling

Abstract

In an era of unprecedented environmental change, there have been increasing ecological and global public health concerns associated with exposure to anthropogenic pollutants. While there is a pressing need to remediate polluted ecosystems, human intervention strategies might unwittingly oppose selection for natural detoxification, which is primarily carried out by microbes. We test this possibility in the context of a ubiquitous chemical remediation strategy aimed at targeting toxic metal pollution: the addition of lime-containing materials. Here we show that raising pH by liming decreased the availability of toxic metals in acidic mine-degraded soils, but as a consequence selected against microbial taxa that naturally remediate soil through the production of metal-scavenging siderophores. Understanding the ecological and evolutionary consequences of human intervention on key traits is crucial for the engineering of evolutionary resilient microbial communities, having important implications for human health and biotechnology.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.