Co-evolving wing spots and mating displays are genetically separable traits in Drosophila
J. H. Massey, G. R. Rice, A. Firdaus, C.-Y. Chen, S.-D. Yeh, D. Stern, P. Wittkopp
Abstract
The evolution of sexual traits often involves correlated changes in morphology and behavior. For example, in Drosophila, divergent mating displays are often accompanied by divergent pigment patterns. To better understand how such traits co-evolve, we investigated the genetic basis of correlated divergence in wing pigmentation and mating display between the sibling species Drosophila elegans and D. gunungcola. Drosophila elegans males have an area of black pigment on their wings known as a wing spot and appear to display this spot to females by extending their wings laterally during courtship. By contrast, D. gunungcola lacks both of these traits. Using Multiplexed Shotgun Genotyping (MSG), we identified a [~]440 kb region on the X chromosome that behaves like a genetic switch controlling the presence or absence of male-specific wing spots. This region includes the candidate gene optomotor-blind (omb), which plays a critical role in patterning the Drosophila wing. The genetic basis of divergent wing display is more complex, with at least two loci on the X chromosome and two loci on autosomes contributing to its evolution. Introgressing the X-linked region affecting wing spot development from D. gunungcola into D. elegans reduced pigmentation in the wing spots but did not affect the wing display, indicating that these are genetically separable traits. Consistent with this observation, broader sampling of wild D. gunungcola populations confirmed the wing spot and wing display are evolving independently: some D. gunungcola males preformed wing displays similar to D. elegans despite lacking wing spots. These data suggest that correlated selection pressures rather than physical linkage or pleiotropy are responsible for the coevolution of these morphological and behavioral traits. They also suggest that the change in morphology evolved prior to the change in behavior.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Evolution of Drosophila buzzatii wings: Modular genetic organization, sex-biased integrative selection and intralocus sexual conflict
P. P. Iglesias, F. A. Machado, … E. M. Soto·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2021
- Sexually monomorphic wing pigmentation pattern does not contribute to mate choice in Drosophila guttifera
T. Niida, S. Koshikawa·bioRxiv·May 4, 2020
- Distinct genetic architectures underlie divergent thorax, leg, and wing pigmentation between Drosophila elegans and D. gunungcola
J. H. Massey, J. Li, … P. Wittkopp·bioRxiv·Jun 28, 2020
- Sexual selection drives the evolution of wing interference patterns.
M. Hawkes, E. Duffy, … J. Troscianko·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2018
- From simplicity to complexity: The gain or loss of spot rows underlies the morphological diversity of three Drosophila species
William A. Dion, Mujeeb Olushola Shittu, … Thomas Werner·bioRxiv·Apr 3, 2020
- Sexually antagonistic co-evolution can explain female display signals and male sensory adaptations.
R. A. W. Wiberg, R. L. Murray, … L. F. Bussiere·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2022