MAHOMES II: A webserver for predicting if a metal binding site is enzymatic
Ryan FeehaniD, Matthew M. CopelandiD, Meghan Whitney Franklin, Joanna S.G. SluskyiD
Abstract
Recent advances have enabled high-quality computationally generated structures for proteins with no solved crystal structures. However, protein function data remains largely limited to experimental methods and homology mapping. Since structure determines function, it is natural that methods capable of using computationally generated structures for functional annotations need to be advanced. Our laboratory recently developed a method to distinguish between metalloenzyme and non-enzyme sites. Here we report improvements to this method by upgrading our physicochemical features to alleviate the need for structures with sub-angstrom precision and using machine learning to reduce training data labeling error. Our improved classifier identifies protein bound metal sites as enzymatic or non-enzymatic with 94% precision and 92% recall. We demonstrate that both adjustments increased predictive performance and reliability on sites with sub-angstrom variations. We constructed a set of predicted metalloprotein structures with no solved crystal structures and no detectable homology to our training data. Our model had an accuracy of 90 - 97.5% depending on the quality of the predicted structures included in our test. Finally, we found the physicochemical trends that drove this models successful performance were local protein density, second shell ionizable residue burial, and the pockets accessibility to the site. We anticipate that our models ability to correctly identify catalytic metal sites could enable identification of new enzymatic mechanisms and improve de novo metalloenzyme design success rates. Significance statementIdentification of enzyme active sites on proteins with unsolved crystallographic structures can accelerate discovery of novel biochemical reactions, which can impact healthcare, industrial processes, and environmental remediation. Our lab has developed an ML tool for predicting sites on computationally generated protein structures as enzymatic and non-enzymatic. We have made our tool available on a webserver, allowing the scientific community to rapidly search previously unknown protein function space.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Field percentile
- top 27%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Machine Learning Differentiates Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Metals in Proteins
R. Feehan, M. W. Franklin, J. S. G. Slusky·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2021
- BioMetAll v2.0: Introducing Scores, Metal Discrimination, and Side-Chain Descriptors for Predicting Metal-Binding Sites in Proteins.
José‐Emilio Sánchez‐Aparicio, Raúl Fernández-Díaz, … Jean‐Didier Maréchal·bioRxiv·Jul 12, 2026
- Investigating Enzyme Function by Geometric Matching of Catalytic Motifs
R. Hackett, Ioannis G. Riziotis, … Janet M. Thornton·Protein SciencePeer-reviewed·Aug 6, 2026
- N-Zinclopedia: A database of predicted transition metal-binding sites and metalloenzymes
Gilad Mechtinger, Gabriel Axel, … Nir Ben‐Tal·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2026
- Protein functional site annotation using local structure embeddings
Alexander Derry, Alp Tartici, Russ Biagio Altman·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2025
- Human Metalloenzymes Are Disproportionately Linked to Disease: The HEAM Structural Annotation Resource
Elizabeth Miller, Samuel Lim, … Joanna Sarah Gershkoff Slusky·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2026