Communications ChemistryEcologyPeer-reviewed journal article
Reference Library for Suspect Non-targeted Screening of Environmental Toxicants Using Ion Mobility Spectrometry-Mass Spectrometry
Devin Teri, Noor A. Aly, James N. DoddsiD, Jian ZhangiD, Paul A ThiesseniD, Evan BoltoniD, Kara M. JosephiD, Antony WilliamsiD, Emma SchymanskiiD, Ivan RusyniD, Erin Shammel BakeriD
Abstract
As our health is affected by the xenobiotic chemicals we are exposed to, it is important to rapidly assess these molecules both in the environment and our bodies. Targeted analytical methods coupling either gas or liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS or LC-MS) are commonly utilized in current exposure assessments. While these methods are accepted as the gold standard for exposure analyses, they often require multiple sample preparation steps and more than 30 minutes per sample. This throughput limitation is a critical gap for exposure assessments and has resulted in an evolving interest in using ion mobility spectrometry and MS (IMS-MS) for non-targeted studies. IMS-MS is a unique technique due to its rapid analytical capabilities (millisecond scanning) and detection of a wide range of chemicals based on unique collision cross section (CCS) and mass-to-charge (m/z) values. To increase the availability of IMS-MS information for exposure studies, here we utilized drift tube IMS-MS to evaluate 4,685 xenobiotic chemical standards from the Environmental Protection Agency Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) program including pesticides, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, consumer products, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). In the analyses, 3,993 [M+H]+, [M+Na]+, [M-H]- and [M+]+ ion types were observed with high confidence and reproducibility ([≤]1% error intra-laboratory and [≤]2% inter-laboratory) from 2,140 unique chemicals. These values were then assembled into an openly available multidimensional database and uploaded to PubChem to enable rapid IMS-MS suspect screening for a wide range of environmental contaminants, faster response time in environmental exposure assessments, and assessments of xenobiotic-disease connections.
- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Uncovering Xenobiotics in the Dark Metabolome using Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Mass Defect Analysis and Machine Learning
- Using XCiMS to Quantify the Benefits of Ion Mobility Spectrometry for Untargeted Metabolomics
Lingjue Wang, Kevin Cho, … Gary J. Patti·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2026
- Updated Guidance for Communicating PFAS Identification Confidence with Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Anna K. Boatman, Jessie R. Chappel, … Erin Shammel Baker·Environmental Science & TechnologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2025
- TIMS-Bench: Towards community standards for benchmarking untargeted trapped ion mobility metabolomics tools and datasets
Prajit Rajkumar, Yojana Gadiya, … Biswapriya B. Misra·bioRxiv·May 27, 2026
- IsoSpace: Chemistry-Informed Dimensionality Reduction and Automated Isotope Candidate Detection in Imaging Mass Spectrometry
Meenakshi Meenakshi, Lukasz G. Migas, … Raf Van de Plas·bioRxiv·Dec 2, 2025
- Ion Mobility for Unknown Metabolite Identification: Hope or Hype?
C. K. Asef, M. Rainey, … F. Fernandez·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2022