An integrative multi-context Mendelian randomization method for identifying risk genes across human tissues
Yihao LuiD, Ke Xu, Nathaniel MaydanchikiD, Bowei KangiD, Brandon L. PierceiD, Fan YangiD, Lin CheniD
Abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) provides valuable assessments of the causal effect of exposure on outcome, yet the application of conventional MR methods for mapping risk genes encounters new challenges. One of the issues is the limited availability of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) as instrumental variables (IVs), hampering the estimation of sparse causal effects. Additionally, the often context/tissue-specific eQTL effects challenge the MR assumption of consistent IV effects across eQTL and GWAS data. To address these challenges, we propose a multi-context multivariable integrative MR framework, mintMR, for mapping expression and molecular traits as joint exposures. It models the effects of molecular exposures across multiple tissues in each gene region, while simultaneously estimating across multiple gene regions. It uses eQTLs with consistent effects across more than one tissue type as IVs, improving IV consistency. A major innovation of mintMR involves employing multi-view learning methods to collectively model latent indicators of disease relevance across multiple tissues, molecular traits, and gene regions. The multi-view learning captures the major patterns of disease-relevance and uses these patterns to update the estimated tissue relevance probabilities. The proposed mintMR iterates between performing a multi-tissue MR for each gene region and joint learning the disease-relevant tissue probabilities across gene regions, improving the estimation of sparse effects across genes. We apply mintMR to evaluate the causal effects of gene expression and DNA methylation for 35 complex traits using multi-tissue QTLs as IVs. The proposed mintMR controls genome-wide inflation and offers new insights into disease mechanisms.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Field percentile
- top 11%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A robust two-sample Mendelian Randomization method integrating GWAS with multi-tissue eQTL summary statistics
Kevin J. Gleason, Fan Yang, Lin Chen·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2021
- Systematic Mendelian randomization framework elucidates hundreds of genetic loci which may influence disease through changes in DNA methylation levels
Tom G. Richardson, Philip Haycock, … Gibran Hemani·Human Molecular GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 6, 2018
- MRLocus: identifying causal genes mediating a trait through Bayesian estimation of allelic heterogeneity
Anqi Zhu, Nana Matoba, … Michael I. Love·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2021
- Mendelian randomization for multiple exposures and outcomes with Bayesian Directed Acyclic Graphs exploration and causal effects estimation
Verena Zuber, Héléne T. Cronjé, … Leonardo Bottolo·bioRxiv·Jun 18, 2024
- A novel Mendelian randomization method identifies causal relationships between gene expression and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
Adriaan van der Graaf, Annique Claringbould, … Serena Sanna·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2020
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using Multiple Biomarkers of an Underlying Common Exposure
Jin Jin, Guanghao Qi, … Nilanjan Chatterjee·BiostatisticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2024