Genome-wide genetic risk for SLE and disease severity
Lingyan CheniD, Yongfei WangiD, Lu LiuiD, Adrianna M. BielowkaiD, Rahell Ahmed, Huoru Zhang, Phil Tombleson, Amy L. RobertsiD, Christopher A. OdhamsiD, Deborah S. Cunninghame GrahamiD, Xuejun ZhangiD, Wanling YangiD, Timothy James VyseiD, David Lester MorrisiD
Abstract
ObjectiveUsing three European and two Chinese genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we investigated the performance of genetic risk scores (GRS) for predicting the susceptibility and severity of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), using renal disease as a proxy for severity. MethodsWe used four GWASs to test the performance of GRS both cross validating within the European population and between European and Chinese populations. The performance of GRS in SLE risk prediction was evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. We then analyzed the polygenic nature of SLE statistically. We also partitioned patients according to their age-of-onset and evaluated the predictability of GRS in disease severity in each age group. ResultsWe found consistently that the best GRS in the prediction of SLE used SNPs associated at the level of P<1e-05 in all GWAS datasets and that SNPs with P-values above 0.2 were inflated for SLE true positive signals. The GRS results in an area under the ROC curve ranging between 0.64 and 0.72, within European and between the European and Chinese populations. We further showed a significant positive correlation between a GRS and renal disease in two independent European GWAS (Pcohort1=2.44e-08; Pcohort2=0.00205) and a significant negative correlation with age of SLE onset (Pcohort1=1.76e-12; Pcohort2=0.00384). We found that the GRS performed better in prediction of renal disease in the later onset compared to the earlier onset group. ConclusionThe GRS predicts SLE in both European and Chinese populations and correlates with poorer prognostic factors: young age of onset and lupus nephritis.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 102
- FWCI
- 10.36
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of 38 novel loci for systemic lupus erythematosus and genetic heterogeneity that may underly population disparities in this disease
Yongfei Wang, Yan Zhang, … Wanling Yang·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 3, 2021
- Genome-wide Association Clustering Meta-analysis in European and Chinese Datasets for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus identifies new genes
Mohammad Saeed·medRxiv·Jul 7, 2023
- Prediction of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus from Genotype and Gene-Expression Data: Batch Correction and Leakage Free Evaluation
Vasudha Kannan, Karthik R, … Hitesh Kandarpa·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2026
- Genetic load in incomplete lupus erythematosus
M. Slief, J. Kheir, … J. M. Guthridge·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2022
- Generalizing Genetic Risk Scores from Europeans to Hispanics/Latinos
Kelsey E. Grinde, Qibin Qi, … Tamar Sofer·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 15, 2018
- Genomic dissection of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Distinct Susceptibility, Activity and Severity Signatures
Nikolaos I. Panousis, George K Bertsias, … Dimitrios T. Boumpas·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2018