bioRxivEcologyPreprint
Wildlife feeding increases risk of male wild turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) to hunter harvest
Marcus A. LashleyiD, Elizabeth A. LeipoldiD, Brandon McDonald, Carolina BaruzziiD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Wildlife feeding during the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) hunting season is legal in many states within the United States, but hunting turkeys with the aid of bait is unlawful in most states. The most common policy to prevent wildlife feeding from acting as bait is to restrict hunting within a defined radius. However, the effect of wildlife feeders on turkey harvest risk and the effectiveness of distance restrictions on mitigating that influence have not been investigated. During 2024-2025, we used GPS transmitters to track 30 adult male turkeys during the spring hunting season on private land with active feeders in Florida, USA, where hunting turkeys within a 91 m radius of a feeder was unlawful. We used Cox proportional hazard models to link risk of hunter harvest with unique feeders visited daily, number of feeders within a home range, and average morning distance and roosting distance to feeders at multiple temporal scales. Hunters harvested 53% of the tagged turkeys. Risk of hunter harvest increased with the number of unique feeders visited the previous day and after the first three days of hunting season with the number of active feeders within a home range. As distance from the most recent roost site and average morning distance to a feeder decreased, risk of hunter harvest increased. We estimated that risk of hunter harvest would be reduced by over 50% if distance restrictions were increased from 100 m to 200 m, by nearly 75% with an increase from 100 m to 300 m, and by nearly 90% with an increase from 100 m to 500 m. To completely eliminate the influence of wildlife feeders on risk of hunter harvest would require a restriction distance well beyond a 500m radius, which is impractical given that this radius would result in an area twice the average private landowner property size in the region. Thus, if wildlife feeding during the turkey hunting season is to be allowed, it will act as bait, in which case, the acceptable level of its influence as bait can be achieved with the appropriate hunting radius restriction.
- organism: non-human primate
- research focus: host-pathogen & immune response
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Decreased female survival may explain wild turkey decline
Marcus A. Lashley, M. Colter Chitwood, … Mark A. Turner·bioRxiv·May 16, 2025
- Incidental Eagle Carcass Detection Can Contribute to Fatality Estimation at Operating Wind Facilities
E. C. Hallingstad, D. Riser-Espinoza, S. Brown·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2022
- Multispecies relations shape bird-feeding practices
Tuomas Aivelo, Mikko Aulio, … Anttoni Kervinen·npj BiodiversityPeer-reviewed·Mar 18, 2025
- Estimating Species-specific U.S. Waterfowl Harvest
Ben C. Augustine, Jeffrey Andrew Royle·bioRxiv·Jul 27, 2024
- Associations of waterbirds with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields: increasing foraging opportunities or just gathering for the feast?
João Paulino, José P. Granadeiro, … Teresa Catry·OecologiaPeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2026
- Evaluating key evidence and formulating regulatory alternatives regarding the UK Hunting Trophies (Import Prohibition) Bill
D. Challender, M. 't Sas-Rolfes, … D. Roe·bioRxiv·Jun 13, 2023