Sex-biased gene expression shapes sex differences in gene essentiality
Abstract
Sex differences in disease incidence and progression are well documented, yet their underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Multiple models suggest that baseline gene expression levels shape the impact of gene disruption, raising the possibility that sex-biased expression itself contributes to sex differences in cellular vulnerability. Here, we test this hypothesis by integrating sex-biased transcriptomic profiles with large-scale CRISPR loss-of-function screens to determine whether sex-biased expression predicts sex-biased gene essentiality across the genome. We find that gene expression level and sex chromosome dosage each explain a modest fraction of variance in essentiality, with substantially larger effects for sex chromosome genes than for autosomes. Across genes, sex effects on expression and essentiality are small in magnitude but directionally aligned, suggesting that sex differences in transcription can influence functional dependency. To resolve how these relationships arise, we applied gene-level mediation analyses to decompose sex effects on essentiality into expression-mediated and expression-independent components. This approach revealed multiple mechanistic architectures. On autosomes, most genes exhibited either sex-biased essentiality from direct sex effects (independent of expression) or sex-biased expression without functional consequence, while expression-mediated sex differences accounted for a smaller but substantial fraction of genes. In contrast, X chromosome genes were dominated by direct, expression-independent sex differences, consistent with strong effects of sex chromosome dosage, but also showed enrichment of expression-mediated architectures, particularly among X gametologs. Together, our results demonstrate that while sex-biased expression can generate sex-biased gene essentiality, this mechanism is not the default. Instead, sex-biased functional dependency is often driven by direct, expression-independent effects, particularly on the X chromosome, where dosage and compensatory mechanisms play a dominant role.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Escape from X inactivation drives sex differences in gene expression
Carrie Zhu, Liaoyi Xu, Arbel Harpak·Molecular Biology and EvolutionPeer-reviewed·Feb 25, 2026
- Gene essentiality in cancer cell lines is modified by the sex chromosomes
Shahar Shohat, Ethel Vol, Sagiv Shifman·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2022
- Escape from X inactivation varies across genes and tissues and shapes sex-biased sex chromosome gene expression
Alex R. DeCasien·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Feb 19, 2026
- Analysis of sex differential genes at whole genome level reveals their organ- and chromosome-dependent expressions, regulations, and interactions
- Impact of the X chromosome and sex on regulatory variation
Kimberly R Kukurba, Princy Parsana, … Stephen B Montgomery·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2015
- Reassessing the "sexy" X hypothesis reveals distinct cellular and disease signatures of X-linked genes in male sexual differentiation and reproduction
Katia Ancelin, Praveenan Somasundaram, Rafael Galupa·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2026