The long and the short of it: Nanopore based eDNA metabarcoding of marine vertebrates works; sensitivity and specificity depend on amplicon lengths
Karlijn DoorenspleetiD, Max JanseiD, Saskia OosterbroekiD, Pauline KamermansiD, O.G. BosiD, Erik WurziD, Albertinka Jacoba MurkiD, Reindert NijlandiD
Abstract
To monitor the effect of nature restoration projects in North Sea ecosystems, accurate and intensive biodiversity assessments are vital. DNA based techniques and especially environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is becoming a powerful monitoring tool. However, current approaches are based on genetic target regions <500 nucleotides, which offer limited taxonomic resolution. We developed a method for eDNA metabarcoding, based on nanopore sequencing of a longer amplicon, enabling improved identification of fish species. We designed a universal primer pair targeting a 2kb region of fish mitochondria, and compared it to the commonly used MiFish primer pair that targets only [~]170bp. In sillico and mock community testing showed that the 2kb fragments improved the accurate identification of genetically closely related species. eDNA was amplified, and sequenced using the Oxford Nanopore MinION in combination with the sequence read processing pipeline Decona. Analyzing eDNA from a North Sea aquarium showed that sequences from both primer pairs could be assigned to most species, but both approaches also identified unique species in the aquarium eDNA. Next, both primer pairs were used on multiple eDNA samples from the North Sea. Here, similar location specific fish communities were obtained from both approaches. More species were identified through the MiFish approach in the field samples. Interestingly, this difference was not observed in the aquarium, suggesting that 2kb fragment based metabarcoding potentially detects more recent occurrences of animals. This new method has the potential to improve and expand the molecular toolbox for eDNA based monitoring approaches.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 29
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Field percentile
- top 1%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- On-site metabarcoding analysis of environmental DNA samples
Quentin Mauvisseau, Isabelle Ewers, … Jonathan Stuart Ready·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2026
- Comparative analysis of metabarcoding and metagenomics for fish biodiversity estimates using standard and novel high-flow filtration methods
Daniël van Berkel, Niels W. P. Brevé, … Reindert Nijland·Metabarcoding and MetagenomicsPeer-reviewed·May 18, 2026
- Omitting end preparation reduces index misassignment in Nanopore-based DNA metabarcoding: application to a decadal coastal time series in the Sea of Okhotsk
Masatoshi Endo, Satoshi Nagai, … Kazutoshi Yoshitake·bioRxiv·Sep 10, 2026
- eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems
J. M. Jackman, C. Benvenuto, … N. G. Sales·bioRxiv·Jan 5, 2021
- Long-range PCR amplification and nanopore sequencing of 8-10 kb mitochondrial fragments from environmental DNA
Stephanie A. Matthews, Olivia M. Scott, … Ryan P. Kelly·bioRxiv·Jan 14, 2026
- eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool for marine protected areas
Zachary J. Gold, Joshua L. Sprague, … Paul Henry Barber·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 24, 2021