MetabolitesBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
WiPP: Workflow for improved Peak Picking for Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) data
Nico BorgsmülleriD, Yoann GloagueniD, Tobias OpiallaiD, Eric BlanciD, Emilie Sicard, Anne‐Lise RoyeriD, Bruno Le BizeciD, Stéphanie DurandiD, Carole MignéiD, Mélanie PétéraiD, Estelle Pujos‐GuillotiD, Franck GiacomoniiD, Yann GuittoniD, Dieter BeuleiD, Jennifer KirwaniD
Abstract
Lack of reliable peak detection impedes automated analysis of large scale GC-MS metabolomics datasets. Performance and outcome of individual peak-picking algorithms can differ widely depending on both algorithmic approach and parameters as well as data acquisition method. Comparing and contrasting between algorithms is thus difficult. Here we present a workflow for improved peak picking (WiPP), a parameter optimising, multi-algorithm peak detection for GC-MS metabolomics. WiPP evaluates the quality of detected peaks using a machine learning-based classification scheme based on seven peak classes. The quality information returned by the classifier for each individual peak is merged with results from different peak detection algorithms to create one final high quality peak set for immediate down stream analysis. Medium and low quality peaks are kept for further inspection. By applying WiPP to standard compound mixes and a complex biological dataset we demonstrate that peak detection is improved through the novel way to assign peak quality, an automated parameter optimisation, and results integration across different embedded peak picking algorithms. Furthermore, our approach can provide an impartial performance comparison of different peak picking algorithms. WiPP is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/bihealth/WiPP) under MIT licence.
- Citations
- 30
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Picky with peakpicking: assessing chromatographic peak quality with simple metrics in metabolomics
William Kumler, Bryna J. Hazelton, Anitra E. Ingalls·BMC BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 27, 2023
- Deep Learning assisted Peak Curation for large scale LC-MS Metabolomics
Yoann Gloaguen, Jennifer Kirwan, Dieter Beule·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Mar 15, 2022
- PeakBot: Machine learning based chromatographic peak picking
Christoph Bueschl, Maria Doppler, … Jürgen Zanghellini·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 23, 2022
- SmartPeak automates targeted and quantitative metabolomics data processing
Svetlana Kutuzova, Pasquale Colaianni, … Douglas McCloskey·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Dec 3, 2020
- Discrepancies in Biomarker Identification in Different Peak-Picking Strategies in Untargeted Metabolomics Analyses of Cells, Tissues, and Biofluids
Iqbal Mahmud, Taylor A. Harmon, … Timothy J. Garrett·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 20, 2025
- Benchmarking feature quality assurance strategies for non-targeted metabolomics
Yasin El Abiead, Maximilian Milford, … Gunda Koellensperger·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2021