Frontiers in GeneticsDevelopmental BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
16p12.1 deletion orthologs are expressed in motile neural crest cells and are important for regulating craniofacial development in Xenopus laevis
Micaela C. LasseriD, Jessica Bolduc, Luke MurphyiD, Caroline O’Brien, Sangmook LeeiD, Santhosh GirirajaniD, Laura Anne LoweryiD
Abstract
Copy number variants (CNVs) associated with neurodevelopmental disorders are characterized by extensive phenotypic heterogeneity. In particular, one CNV was identified in a subset of children clinically diagnosed with intellectual disabilities (ID) that results in a hemizygous deletion of multiple genes at chromosome 16p12.1. In addition to ID, individuals with this deletion display a variety of symptoms including microcephaly, seizures, cardiac defects, and growth retardation. Moreover, patients also manifest severe craniofacial abnormalities, such as micrognathia, cartilage malformation of the ears and nose, and facial asymmetries; however, the function of the genes within the 16p12.1 region have not been studied in the context of vertebrate craniofacial development. The craniofacial tissues affected in patients with this deletion all derive from the same embryonic precursor, the cranial neural crest, leading to the hypothesis that one or more of the 16p12.1 genes may be involved in regulating neural crest cell (NCC)-related processes. To examine this, we characterized the developmental role of the 16p12.1-affected gene orthologs, polr3e, mosmo, uqcrc2, and cdr2, during craniofacial morphogenesis in the vertebrate model system, Xenopus laevis. While the currently-known cellular functions of these genes are diverse, we find that they share similar expression patterns along the neural tube, pharyngeal arches, and later craniofacial structures. As these genes show co-expression in the pharyngeal arches where NCCs reside, we sought to elucidate the effect of individual gene depletion on craniofacial development and NCC migration. We find that reduction of several 16p12.1 genes significantly disrupts craniofacial and cartilage formation, pharyngeal arch migration, as well as NCC specification and motility. Thus, we have determined that some of these genes play an essential role during vertebrate craniofacial patterning by regulating specific processes during NCC development, which may be an underlying mechanism contributing to the craniofacial defects associated with the 16p12.1 deletion.
- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.08
- Field percentile
- 28th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Oligogenic effects of 16p11.2 copy number variation on craniofacial development
Yuqi Qiu, Thomas Arbogast, … Jonathan L. Sebat·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2019
- The conserved and divergent roles of Prdm3 and Prdm16 in zebrafish and mouse craniofacial development
Lomeli Carpio Shull, Rwik Sen, … Kristin Artinger·Developmental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 7, 2020
- Functional assessment of the "two-hit" model for neurodevelopmental defects in Drosophila and X. laevis
Lucilla Pizzo, Micaela C. Lasser, … Santhosh Girirajan·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 5, 2021
- Early embryogenesis in CHDFIDD mouse model reveals facial clefts and altered craniofacial neurogenesis
Marek Hampl, Nela Jandová, … Marcela Buchtová·bioRxiv·Apr 23, 2023
- Disruption of fos causes craniofacial anomalies in developing zebrafish
Lorena Maili, Bhavna Tandon, … Jacqueline T. Hecht·Frontiers in Cell and Developmental BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2023
- Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome-associated genes are enriched in motile neural crest and affect craniofacial development in Xenopus laevis
Alexandra N. Mills, Elizabeth A. Bearce, … Laura Anne Lowery·Frontiers in PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 12, 2019