GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Genetic analysis argues for a coactivator function for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tup1 corepressor
Emily J. ParnelliD, Timothy J. ParnelliD, David J. StillmaniD
Abstract
The Tup1-Cyc8 corepressor complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is recruited to promoters by DNA-binding proteins to repress transcription of genes, including the a-specific mating type genes. We report here a tup1(S649F) mutant that displays mating irregularities similar to a tup1 null and an -predominant growth defect. RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq were used to analyze gene expression and Tup1 occupancy changes in mutant vs. wild-type in both a and cells. Increased Tup1(S649F) occupancy tended to occur upstream of upregulated genes, whereas locations with decreased occupancy usually did not show changes in gene expression, suggesting this mutant not only loses corepressor function but also behaves as a coactivator. Based upon studies demonstrating a dual role of Tup1 in both repression and activation, we postulate that the coactivator function of Tup1(S649F) results from diminished interaction with repressor proteins, including 2. We also found that large changes in mating type-specific gene expression between a and or between mutant and wild-type were not easily explained by the range of Tup1 occupancy levels within their promoters, as predicted by the classic model of a-specific gene repression by Tup1. Most surprisingly, we observed Tup1 occupancy upstream of the a-specific gene MFA2 and the -specific gene MF(ALPHA)1 in cells in which each gene was expressed rather than repressed. These results, combined with identification of additional mating related genes upregulated in the tup1(S649F) strain, illustrate that the role of Tup1 in distinguishing mating types in yeast appears to be both more comprehensive and more nuanced than previously appreciated.
- organism: yeast
- assay: ChIP-seq
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Field percentile
- 47th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tup1 is Critical for Transcriptional Repression in Quiescence in S. cerevisiae
Thomas B. Bailey, Phaedra A. Whitty, … Laura E. McKnight·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2022
- Karyopherin Kap114p regulates TATA-binding protein-mediated transcription
Chung-Chi Liao, Sahana Shankar, … Kuo-Chiang Hsia·bioRxiv·Sep 7, 2018
- Ash1 and Tup1 Dependent Repression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO promoter Requires Activator-Dependent Nucleosome Eviction
Emily J. Parnell, Timothy J. Parnell, … David J. Stillman·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2020
- Regulated repression, and not activation, governs the cell fate promoter controlling yeast meiosis
Janis Tam, Folkert Jacobus van Werven·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 8, 2020
- Balance between mutually exclusive traits shifted by variants of a yeast transcription factor
Michael W. Dorrity, Josh T. Cuperus, … Christine Queitsch·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2018
- Basal association of a transcription factor favors early gene expression
S. Pinheiro, M. Nadal-Ribelles, … S. Pelet·bioRxiv·Mar 26, 2024