Low-intensity focused ultrasound alters the latency and spatial patterns of sensory-evoked cortical responses in vivo.
Abstract
The use of transcranial, low intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) is an emerging neuromodulation technology that shows promise for both therapeutic and research applications. Compared with other noninvasive neuromodulation approaches, key technical advantages include high lateral resolution of stimulation and deep penetration depth. However, empirically observed effects in vivo are diverse; for example, variations in sonication location and waveform can alternatively elicit putatively inhibitory or excitatory effects. At a fundamental level, it is unclear how FUS alters the function of neural circuits at the site of sonication. To address this knowledge gap, we developed an approach to optically interrogate the spatiotemporal patterns of neural activity in the cortex directly at the acoustic focus, thereby offering a glimpse into the local effects of FUS on distributed populations of neurons in vivo. Our experiments probed electrical activity through the use of voltage sensitive dyes (VSDs) and, in transgenic GCaMP6f mice, monitored associated Ca2+ responses. Our results directly demonstrate that low-intensity FUS adjusts both the kinetics and spatial patterns of sensory receptive fields at the acoustic focus in vivo. Although our experimental configuration limits interpretation to population activity, the use of VSDs ensures that the detected alterations reflect activity in cortical neurons, unobscured by signals in subcortical or laterally distant cortical regions. More generally, this optical measurement paradigm can be implemented to observe FUS-induced alterations in cortical representation with higher lateral resolution spatial versatility than is practical through more conventional electrodebased measurements. Our findings suggest that reports of FUS-induced sensory modulation in human studies may partly reflect alterations cortical representation and reactivity.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 28
- FWCI
- 0.70
- Field percentile
- top 34%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ultrasound Neuromodulation and Correlation Change in the Rat Somatosensory Cortex
Sandhya Ramachandran, Xiaodan Niu, … Bin He·bioRxiv·Mar 18, 2022
- Ultrasonic Modulation of Astrocytic and Neuronal Calcium Dynamics in Mouse Cortex
Yu Yong, Hao Jiang, … Fenfang Li·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2025
- Label free, capillary-scale blood flow mapping in vivo reveals that low intensity focused ultrasound evokes persistent dilation in cortical microvasculature
YuBing Y. Shen, Jyoti V. Jethe, … Jonathan A. N. Fisher·Communications BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 6, 2025
- Ultrasound Directly Activates Sparse Neurons and Modulates Visual Circuits in Deafened Mice
Jiaru He, Jiejun Zhu, … Zhihai Qiu·bioRxiv·Mar 9, 2025
- Transcranial Functional Ultrasound Imaging Detects Focused Ultrasound Neuromodulation Induced Hemodynamic Changes In Vivo
Jonas Bendig, Christian Aurup, … Elisa E. Konofagou·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Aug 21, 2026
- Ultrasonic Neuromodulation Causes Widespread Cortical Activation via an Indirect Auditory Mechanism
Tomokazu F. Sato, Mikhail G. Shapiro, Doris Ying Tsao·NeuronPeer-reviewed·May 24, 2018