Sample size requirement for achieving multisite harmonization using structural brain MRI features
Pravesh ParekhiD, Gaurav Vivek BhaleraoiD, Biju ViswanathiD, Naren Prahalada RaoiD, Janardhanan C. NarayanaswamyiD, Palanimuthu Thangaraju SivakumariD, Arun KandasamyiD, Muralidharan Kesavan, Urvakhsh Meherwan MehtaiD, Odity MukherjeeiD, Meera PurushottamiD, Bhupesh MehtaiD, Kandavel ThennarasuiD, B. Binukumar, Jitender S. SainiiD, Deepak JayarajaniD, A. Shyamsundar, Sydney MoirangthemiD, Keshav Kumar, Jayant MahadevaniD, Bharath HollaiD, Jagadisha ThirthalliiD, Bangalore N. GangadhariD, Pratima MurthyiD, Mitradas M. PanickeriD, , Ganesan VenkatasubramanianiD
Abstract
When data is pooled across multiple sites, the extracted features are confounded by site effects. Harmonization methods attempt to correct these site effects while preserving the biological variability within the features. However, little is known about the sample size requirement for effectively learning the harmonization parameters and their relationship with the increasing number of sites. In this study, we performed experiments to find the minimum sample size required to achieve multisite harmonization (using neuroHarmonize) using volumetric and surface features by leveraging the concept of learning curves. Our first two experiments show that site-effects are effectively removed in a univariate and multivariate manner; however, it is essential to regress the effect of covariates from the harmonized data additionally. Our following two experiments with actual and simulated data showed that the minimum sample size required for achieving harmonization grows with the increasing average Mahalanobis distances between the sites and their reference distribution. We conclude by positing a general framework to understand the site effects using the Mahalanobis distance. Further, we provide insights on the various factors in a cross-validation design to achieve optimal inter-site harmonization.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 17
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Field percentile
- top 17%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A deep learning-based multisite neuroimage harmonization framework established with traveling-subject dataset
Dezheng Tian, Zilong Zeng, … Mingrui Xia·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·May 11, 2022
- Harmonization techniques for machine learning studies using multi-site functional MRI data
Ahmed El-Gazzar, Rajat Mani Thomas, Guido Alexander van Wingen·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2023
- Contributions of Site Heterogeneity in Multi-site Brain-Phenotype Predictions
Guanru Chen, Megan Jones, … Simon Vandekar·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026
- Goal-specific brain MRI harmonization
Lijun An, Jianzhong Chen, … the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Study of Aging·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2022
- Harmonization of resting-state functional MRI data across multiple imaging sites via the separation of site differences into sampling bias and measurement bias
Ayumu Yamashita, Noriaki Yahata, … Hiroshi Imamizu·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 18, 2019
- Imputation-Based Harmonization Mitigates Site Effects Without Data Leakage in Machine Learning Studies
Noah Hillman, Andrew Chen, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·bioRxiv·Oct 5, 2026