henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivGenomicsPreprint

MITE infestation of germline accommodated by genome editing in Blepharisma

Brandon Kwee Boon SeahiD, Minakshi SinghiD, Christiane EmmerichiD, Aditi D. SinghiD, Christian WoehleiD, Bruno HüetteliD, Adam ByerlyiD, Naomi A. StoveriD, Mayumi Sugiura, Terue Harumoto, Estienne Carl SwartiD

PDFDOI

Abstract

During a sophisticated developmental process, ciliates excise numerous internally eliminated sequences (IESs) from a germline genome copy, producing a functional somatic genome. Most IESs ultimately originate from transposons but homology is obscured by sequence decay. To obtain more representative perspectives on ciliate genome editing, we assembled forty thousand IESs of Blepharisma stoltei, from a much earlier-diverging lineage than existing models. Short IESs (< 115 bp) were largely non-repetitive, with a pronounced ~10 bp length periodicity, whereas longer IESs (max 7 kbp) were non-periodic and contained abundant interspersed repeats. Contrary to current models, the Blepharisma germline genome encodes few transposases. Instead, its most abundant repeat (8000 copies) was a Miniature Inverted-repeat Transposable Element (MITE), apparently a deletion derivative of a germline-limited Pogo-family transposon. We propose MITEs as an important and eventually self-limiting IES source. Rather than defending germline genomes against mobile elements, we argue that transposase domestication actually facilitates junk DNA accumulation.

Citations
1

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISSingh '21Sellis '21Seah '24Zangarelli '22Vaschetto '17Seah '21
73% semantic matchGenomics
Minakshi Singh, Brandon Kwee Boon Seah, Christiane Emmerich+8 more·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2021· 3 citations