On the unfounded enthusiasm for soft selective sweeps
Abstract
Underlying any understanding of the mode, tempo, and relative importance of the adaptive process in the evolution of natural populations is the notion of whether adaptation is mutation-limited. Two very different population genetic models have recently been proposed in which the rate of adaptation is not strongly limited by the rate at which newly arising beneficial mutations enter the population. This review discusses the theoretical underpinnings and requirements of these models, as well as the experimental insights on the parameters of relevance. Importantly, empirical and experimental evidence to date challenges the recent enthusiasm for invoking these models to explain observed patterns of variation in humans and Drosophila.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Soft sweeps and beyond: Understanding the patterns and probabilities of selection footprints under rapid adaptation
J. Hermisson, P. S. Pennings·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2017
- Soft selective sweeps in complex demographic scenarios
Benjamin A Wilson, Dmitri Petrov, Philipp W Messer·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 24, 2014
- A dynamical limit to evolutionary adaptation
M. J. Melissa, M. M. Desai·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2023
- Soft sweeps are the dominant mode of adaptation in the human genome
D. R. Schrider, A. D. Kern·bioRxiv·Apr 27, 2017
- Reduced selection during sweeps lead to adaptive momentum on rugged landscapes
Clifford Bohm, Vincent R. Ragusa, … Christoph Adami·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2024
- Greater strength of selection and higher proportion of beneficial amino acid changing mutations in humans compared to mice and Drosophila melanogaster
Y. Zhen, C. D. Huber, … K. E. Lohmueller·bioRxiv·May 27, 2020