Stimulation-Evoked Effective Connectivity (SEEC): An in-vivo approach for defining mesoscale corticocortical connectivity
David T. BundyiD, Scott BarbayiD, Heather M. HudsoniD, Shawn B. FrostiD, Randolph J. NudoiD, David J. GuggenmosiD
Abstract
BackgroundCortical electrical stimulation has been a versatile technique for examining the structure and function of cortical regions as well as for implementing novel therapies. While electrical stimulation has been used to examine the local spread of neural activity, it may also enable longitudinal examination of mesoscale interregional connectivity. Recent studies have used focal intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) with optical imaging to show cross-region spread of neural activity, but techniques are limited to utilizing hemodynamic responses within anesthetized preparations. ObjectiveHere, we sought to use ICMS in conjunction with recordings of multi-unit action potentials to assess the mesoscale effective connectivity within sensorimotor cortex. MethodsNeural recordings were made from multielectrode arrays placed into sensory, motor, and premotor regions during surgical experiments in three squirrel monkeys. During each recording, single-pulse ICMS was repeatably delivered to a single region. Mesoscale effective connectivity was calculated from ICMS-evoked changes in multi-unit firing. ResultsMulti-unit action potentials were able to be detected on the order of 1 ms after each ICMS pulse. Across sensorimotor regions, short-latency (< 2.5 ms) ICMS-evoked neural activity strongly correlated with known anatomic connections. Additionally, ICMS-evoked responses remained stable across the experimental period, despite small changes in electrode locations and anesthetic state. ConclusionsThese results show that monitoring ICMS-evoked neural activity, in a technique we refer to as Stimulation-Evoked Effective Connectivity (SEEC), is a viable way to longitudinally assess effective connectivity enabling studies comparing the time course of connectivity changes with the time course of changes in behavioral function. HighlightsO_LIShort-latency neural responses to ICMS were evaluated in multiple cortical regions. C_LIO_LINeural responses strongly correlated with known anatomical connections. C_LIO_LIStimulation-evoked neural responses were maintained across repeated tests. C_LIO_LIICMS-evoked activity can show longitudinal changes in effective connectivity. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Field percentile
- top 39%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Responses of cortical neurons to intracortical microstimulation in awake primates
Richy Yun, Jonathan H. Mishler, … Eberhard E. Fetz·eNeuroPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2023
- Spatiotemporal properties of cortical excitatory and inhibitory neuron activation by sustained and bursting electrical microstimulation
Christopher L. Hughes, Kevin C. Stieger, … Takashi D.Y. Kozai·iSciencePeer-reviewed·May 20, 2025
- Characterizing the short-latency evoked response to intracortical microstimulation across a multi-electrode array
Joseph T Sombeck, Juliet O. Heye, … Lee E. Miller·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2022
- Somatosensory cortex microstimulation modulates primary motor and premotor cortex neurons with extensive spatial convergence and divergence
Brandon M. Ruszala, Kevin A. Mazurek, Marc H. Schieber·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2023
- Spatial Distribution of Cortical Output Zones Affecting Combinations of Forelimb Muscles in the Monkey
Paul D. Cheney, Suzanne Sawyer Vincent, … Eberhard E. Fetz·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2026
- Stoney vs. Histed: Quantifying the Spatial Effects of Intracortical Microstimulation
Karthik Kumaravelu, Joseph T Sombeck, … Warren M. Grill·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2021