Uncovering the Consequences of Batch-Effect Associated Missing Values in Omics Data Analysis
Abstract
Statistical analyses in high-dimensional omics data are often hampered by the presence of batch effects (BEs) and missing values (MVs), but the interaction between these two issues is not well-studied nor understood. MVs may manifest as a BE when their proportions differ across batches. These are termed as Batch-Effect Associated Missing values (BEAMs). We hypothesized that BEAMs in data may introduce bias which can impede the performance of missing value imputation (MVI). To test this, we simulated data with two batches, then introduced over 100 iterations, either 20% and 40% MVs in each batch (BEAMs) or 30% in both (control). K-nearest neighbours (KNN) was then used to perform MVI, in a typical global approach (M1) and a supposed superior batch-sensitized approach (M2). BEs were then corrected using ComBat. The effectiveness of the MVI was evaluated by its imputation accuracy and true and false positive rates. Notably, when BEAMs existed, M2 was generally undesirable as the differing application of MV filtering in M1 and M2 strategies resulted in an overall coverage deficiency. Additionally, both M1 and M2 strategies suffered in the presence of BEAMs, highlighting the need for a novel approach to handle MVI in data with BEAMs. Author summaryData in high-throughput omics data are often combined from different sources (batches), which creates batch effects in the data. Missing values are a common occurrence in these data, and their proportions are assumed to be equal across batches. However, instances exist when these proportions vary between batches, such as one batch having more missing values than another, resulting in batch effect associated missing values. Missing values are often dealt with through missing value imputation, but whether the variation in missing value proportions across batches affects imputation outcomes is unknown. In this paper, we investigate the consequence of performing imputation when this issue persists. We simulated data with equal and unequal missing value proportions, then assessed the performance of k-nearest neighbours imputation by its imputation accuracy and downstream analysis outcomes. This revealed that unequal missing value proportions worsens imputation and establishes the need for smarter imputation strategies to handle this complication.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- NPmatch: Latent Batch Effects Correction of Omics data by Nearest-Pair Matching
Antonino Zito, Axel Martinelli, … Ivo Kwee·bioRxiv·Apr 29, 2024
- Multiple Imputation Approaches Applied to the Missing Value Problem in Bottom-up Proteomics
Miranda L. Gardner, Michael A. Freitas·International Journal of Molecular SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 6, 2021
- Characterization of missing values in untargeted MS-based metabolomics data and evaluation of missing data handling strategies
Kieu Trinh Do, Simone Wahl, … Jan Krumsiek·MetabolomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 20, 2018
- Missing Value Imputation Approach for Mass Spectrometry-based Metabolomics Data
Runmin Wei, Jingye Wang, … Yan Ni·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 8, 2018
- Imputation for Lipidomics and Metabolomics (ImpLiMet): Online application for optimization and method selection for missing data imputation
Huiting Ou, Anuradha Surendra, … Miroslava Čuperlović‐Culf·Bioinformatics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Dec 26, 2024
- A peptide-level multiple imputation strategy accounting for the different natures of missing values in proteomics data
Quentin Giai Gianetto, Samuel Wieczorek, … Thomas Bürger·bioRxiv·May 29, 2020