Bouncing back: Transient, but not long-lasting, effects of background disturbances on speech processing
Orel LevyiD, Rotem Waxman, Shun Okada, Ofek Ben Abu, Elana Zion GolumbiciD
Abstract
Processing and understanding speech in face of occasional background disturbances can be difficult and often leads to distraction and reduced comprehension. However, despite the vast literature on the detrimental effects of processing speech-in-noise, little is known about the time-course of these effects. Here we studied whether reduced speech processing is limited only to the period when disruptions mask target speech, or if processing difficulties linger even after disruptions end, suggesting longer lasting distraction. Using an ecologically-relevant experimental design, we measured neural activity and skin-conductance from participants as they watched an educational video-lecture. Short background speech comments, mimicking plausible classroom disruptions, were occasional embedded in half of the lecture segments. Speech disruptions elicited robust neurophysiological orienting responses, reflected in a neural auditory ERP and a phasic increase in skin conductance. Importantly, when disruptions were presented, we observed a marked reduction in neural tracking of the lecture, increased inter-subject correlation (ISC), and decreased alpha power, suggesting a brief diversion of processing resources away from the target speech. However, these effects were transient in nature, with all neural measures returning to baseline immediately after disruption offset, showing no evidence for prolonged disruption-related costs or impaired comprehension. Interestingly, neurophysiological responses to disruption and return to baseline were not correlated with self-reported symptoms of attention-deficits (ADD). These findings highlight the resilience of auditory attention, demonstrating its ability to maintain a robust representations of target speech over time, despite of transient ecological disturbances.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds
Lorenz Fiedler, Ingrid S. Johnsrude, Dorothea Wendt·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 4, 2025
- Auditory neural tracking reflects target enhancement but not distractor suppression in a psychophysically augmented continuous-speech paradigm
Martin Orf, Malte Wöstmann, … Jonas Obleser·iSciencePeer-reviewed·May 11, 2023
- Attentional disengagement during external and internal distractions reduces neural speech tracking in background noise
Yue Ren, M. Eric Cui, Björn Herrmann·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2026
- Distracting Linguistic Information Impairs Neural Tracking of Attended Speech
Bohan Dai, James M. McQueen, … Anne Kösem·Current Research in NeurobiologyPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022
- Talker discontinuity disrupts attention to speech: Evidence from EEG and pupillometry
Sung-Joo Lim, Yaminah D. Carter, … Tyler K. Perrachione·Brain and LanguagePeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2021
- Intelligible distracting speech disrupts early auditory attention
Benjamin N. Richardson, Maanasa Guru Adimurthy, … Barbara G. Shinn‐Cunningham·bioRxiv·Aug 24, 2026