Polymer physics and machine learning reveal a combinatorial code linking chromatin 3D architecture to 1D epigenetics
Andrea EspositoiD, Simona BiancoiD, Andrea M. ChiarielloiD, Alex AbrahamiD, Luca FiorilloiD, Mattia ConteiD, Raffaele CampanileiD, Mario NicodemiiD
Abstract
The mammalian genome has a complex 3D organization, serving vital functional purposes, yet it remains largely unknown how the multitude of specific DNA contacts, e.g., between transcribed and regulatory regions, is orchestrated by chromatin organizers, such as Transcription Factors. Here, we implement a method combining machine learning and polymer physics to infer from only Hi-C data the genomic 1D arrangement of the minimal set of binding sites sufficient to recapitulate, through only physics, 3D contact patterns genome-wide in human and mouse cells. The inferred binding sites are validated by their predictions on how chromatin refolds in a set of duplications at the Sox9 locus against available independent cHi-C data, showing that their different phenotypes originate from distinct enhancer hijackings in their 3D structure. Albeit derived from only Hi-C, our binding sites fall in epigenetic classes that well match chromatin states from epigenetic segmentation studies, such as active, poised and repressed states. However, the inferred binding domains have an overlapping, combinatorial organization along chromosomes, missing in epigenetic segmentations, which is required to explain Hi-C contact specificity with high accuracy. In a reverse approach, the epigenetic profile of binding domains provides a code to derive from only epigenetic marks the DNA binding sites and, hence, the 3D architecture, as validated by successful predictions of Hi-C matrices in an independent set of chromosomes. Overall, our results shed light on how complex 3D architectural information is encrypted in 1D epigenetics via the related, combinatorial arrangement of specific binding sites along the genome.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 43
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Field percentile
- top 7%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Polymer Simulations of Heteromorphic Chromatin Predict the 3-D Folding of Complex Genomic Loci
Adam Buckle, Chris A. Brackley, … Nick Gilbert·Molecular CellPeer-reviewed·Oct 18, 2018
- Epigenome-informed Polymer Modeling Reveals Chromosome Folding Landscapes across Distinct Genetic and Epigenetic Contexts
Saman Bazmi, Alexander Turco, Sushant Kumar·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2026
- Efficient Hi-C inversion facilitates chromatin folding mechanism discovery and structure prediction
G. Schuette, X. Ding, B. Zhang·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2023
- De Novo Prediction of Human Chromosome Structures: Epigenetic Marking Patterns Encode Genome Architecture
M. Di Pierro, R. R. Cheng, … J. N. Onuchic·bioRxiv·Aug 7, 2017
- Connecting high-resolution 3D chromatin organization with epigenomics
Fan Feng, Yuan Yao, … Jie Liu·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 19, 2022
- Discovery of dynamic changes in 3D chromatin architecture through polymer physics model
Anubhooti, Abdul Wasim, … Jagan M.R. Pongubala·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2024