Diffusion MRI Head Motion Correction Methods are Highly Accurate but Impacted by Denoising and Sampling Scheme
Matthew CieslakiD, Philip A. CookiD, Golia ShafieiiD, Tinashe M. TaperaiD, Hamsanandini RadhakrishnaniD, Mark A. ElliottiD, David R. RoalfiD, Desmond J. OathesiD, Dani S. BassettiD, Matthew Dylan TisdalliD, Ariel RokemiD, Scott T. GraftoniD, Theodore Daniel SatterthwaiteiD
Abstract
Correcting head motion artifacts in diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) scans is particularly challenging due to the dramatic changes in image contrast at different gradient strengths and directions. Head motion correction is typically performed using a Gaussian Process model implemented in FSLs Eddy. Recently, the 3dSHORE-based SHORELine method was introduced to correct any dMRI sequence that has more than one shell. Here we perform a comprehensive evaluation of both methods on realistic simulations of a software fiber phantom that provides known ground-truth head motion. We demonstrate that both methods perform remarkably well, but that performance can be impacted by sampling scheme, the pervasiveness of head motion, and the denoising strategy applied before head motion correction. Our study also provides an open and fully-reproducible workflow that could be used to accelerate evaluation studies of other dMRI processing methods in the future. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIBoth Eddy and SHORELine head motion correction methods performed quite well on a large variety of simulated data C_LIO_LIDenoising with MP-PCA can improve head motion correction performance when Eddy is used C_LIO_LISHORELine effectively corrects motion in non-shelled acquisitions C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 15
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Field percentile
- top 9%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- DACO: Distortion/artefact correction for diffusion MRI data in an integrated framework
Yung‐Chin Hsu, Wen‐Yih Isaac Tseng·bioRxiv·Jul 6, 2021
- Modelling motion-induced signal corruption in steady-state diffusion MRI
Benjamin C. Tendler, Wenchuan Wu, … Aaron T. Hess·Magnetic Resonance in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2026
- Eddy current-induced artifacts correction in high gradient strength diffusion MRI with dynamic field monitoring: demonstration in ex vivo human brain imaging
G. Ramos Llorden, D. Park, … S. Y. Huang·bioRxiv·Feb 15, 2023
- Evaluation of six phase encoding based susceptibility distortion correction methods for diffusion MRI
Xuan Gu, Anders Eklund·Frontiers in NeuroinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2019
- Advancing High-Resolution 7T Diffusion MRI: Evaluating Phase-Encoding Correction Strategies for Distortion Correction from Basic to Four-Way Acquisitions
Kurt G. Schilling, Alexander J. S. Beckett, … An T. Vu·Magnetic Resonance ImagingPeer-reviewed·Apr 17, 2026
- The efficacy of different preprocessing steps in reducing motion-related confounds in diffusion MRI connectomics
Stuart Oldham, Aurina Arnatkevičiūtė, … Alex Fornito·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2020