MmCMS: Mouse models' Consensus Molecular Subtypes of colorectal cancer
R. Amirkhah, K. Gilroy, S. Malla, T. Lannagan, R. Byrne, N. C. Fisher, S. Corry, H. Naderi-Meshkin, B. Ahmaderaghi, R. Murray, M. Mills, A. Campbell, ACRCelerate consortium, A. Berenguer Llergo, R. Sanz-Pamplona, A. Villanueva, E. Batlle, R. Salazar, M. Lawler, O. J. Sansom, P. Dunne
Abstract
BACKGROUNDColorectal cancer (CRC) primary tumours are molecularly classified into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS1-4). Genetically engineered mouse models aim to faithfully mimic the complexity of human cancers and, when appropriately aligned, represent ideal pre-clinical systems to test new drug treatments. Despite its importance, dual-species classification has been limited by the lack of a reliable approach. Here we utilise, develop and test a set of options for human-to-mouse CMS classifications of CRC tissue. METHODSUsing transcriptional data from established collections of CRC tumours, including human (TCGA cohort; n=577) and mouse (n=57 across n=8 genotypes) tumours with combinations of random forest and nearest template prediction algorithms, alongside gene ontology collections, we comprehensively assess the performance of a suite of new dual-species classifiers. RESULTSWe developed three approaches: MmCMS-A; a gene-level classifier, MmCMS-B; an ontology-level approach and MmCMS-C; a combined pathway system encompassing multiple biological and histological signalling cascades. Although all options could identify tumours associated with stromal-rich CMS4-like biology, MmCMS-A was unable to accurately classify the biology underpinning epithelial-like subtypes (CMS2/3) in mouse tumours. CONCLUSIONSWhen applying human-based transcriptional classifiers to mouse tumour data, a pathway-level classifier, rather than an individual gene-level system, is optimal. Our R package with three options helps researchers select suitable mouse models of human CRC subtype for their experimental testing.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Consensus molecular subtyping of colorectal cancers is influenced by goblet cell content
Samuel A. Miller, Ahmed H. Ghobashi, Heather M. O’Hagan·Cancer GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 26, 2021
- Metastasis and cancer stem cell markers identify two colorectal cancer subtypes with different molecular and clinical features
Burair A. Alsaihati, Shaying Zhao·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2020
- Molecular subtyping improves prognostication of Stage 2 colorectal cancer
R. V. Purcell, S. Schmeier, … F. A. Frizelle·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2019
- Image-based consensus molecular subtype classification (imCMS) of colorectal cancer using deep learning
K. Sirinukunwattana, E. Domingo, … V. Koelzer·GutPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2020
- Comparative Molecular Genomic Analyses of a Spontaneous Rhesus Macaque Model of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colorectal Cancer
N. Ozirmak Lermi, S. B. Gray, … E. Vilar·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2021
- Comprehensive characterization of tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer via histopathology-molecular analysis