Calibration allows accurate estimation of the axonal volume fraction with diffusion MRI
Sebastian PapazoglouiD, Mohammad Ashtarayeh, Jan Malte OeschgeriD, Martina F. CallaghaniD, Mark D. DoesiD, Siawoosh MohammadiiD
Abstract
Biophysical models enable the non-invasive estimation of microstructural tissue features of the central nervous system such as the axonal volume fraction using diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)-data. However, these models trade accuracy with complexity and demands for time-efficient data acquisition. In this study, we hypothesise that their accuracy can be improved substantially through biophysically motivated, linear calibration. We test this hypothesis in the context of axonal volume fraction estimation in four different DWI-models of different complexity using multi-modal data including ex-vivo diffusion MRI- and electron microscopy (EM)-data in mice with broad dynamic range, whereby the latter served as gold standard. We found that two calibration parameters, an offset accounting for the fraction of unmyelinated axons in severely hypomyelinated mice and a scaling accounting for the compartment-specific relaxation, substantially improved the accuracy of axonal volume fraction. Furthermore, we theoretically predict the scaling parameter, and demonstrate that similar accuracy improvement can be achieved for a subset of DWI-models, if the scaling parameter is fixed to the predicted value instead of estimating it on basis of data. This is of practical relevance because it allows to estimate the remaining offset calibration parameter from a limited amount of multi-modal data and thus makes the proposed method usable in human brain data.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Estimating axial diffusivity in the NODDI model
Amy F.D. Howard, Michiel Cottaar, … Saâd Jbabdi·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 2, 2022
- Electron microscopy 3-dimensional segmentation and quantification of axonal dispersion and diameter distribution in mouse brain corpus callosum
Hong‐Hsi Lee, Katarina Yaros, … Els Fieremans·Brain Structure and FunctionPeer-reviewed·Feb 21, 2019
- Validating the Standard Model of diffusion MRI in white matter with Numerical Substrates
Jasmine Nguyen‐Duc, Quentin Uhl, … Ileana Jelescu·Imaging NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- The influence of axonal beading and undulation on axonal diameter mapping
Hong‐Hsi Lee, Qiyuan Tian, … Susie Y. Huang·bioRxiv·Apr 19, 2023
- Mapping axon conduction delays in vivo from microstructural MRI
Mark Drakesmith, Robbert Harms, … Derek Kenton Jones·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Sep 19, 2019
- Does powder averaging remove dispersion bias in diffusion MRI diameter estimates within real 3D axonal architectures?
Mariam Andersson, Marco Pizzolato, … Tim B. Dyrby·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2021