Spatial transcriptomic analysis of virtual prostate biopsy reveals confounding effect of heterogeneity on genomic signature scoring

Abstract

Genetic signatures have added a molecular dimension to prognostics and therapeutic decision-making. However, tumour heterogeneity in prostate cancer and current sampling methods could confound accurate assessment. Based on previously published spatial transcriptomic data from multifocal prostate cancer, we created virtual biopsy models that mimic conventional biopsy placement and core size. We then analysed the gene expression of different prognostic signatures (OncotypeDx(R), Decipher(R), Prostadiag(R)) using a step-wise approach increasing resolution from pseudo-bulk analysis of the whole biopsy, to differentiation by tissue subtype (benign, stroma, tumour), followed by distinct tumour grade and finally clonal resolution. The gene expression profile of virtual tumour biopsies revealed clear differences between grade groups and tumour clones, compared to a benign control, which were not reflected in bulk analyses. This suggests that bulk analyses of whole biopsies or tumour-only areas, as used in clinical practice, may provide an inaccurate assessment of gene profiles. The type of tissue, the grade of the tumour and the clonal composition all influence the gene expression in a biopsy. Clinical decision making based on biopsy genomics should be made with caution while we await more precise targeting and cost-effective spatial analyses. Patient summaryProstate cancers are very variable, including within a single tumour. Current genetic scoring systems, which are sometimes used to make decisions for how to treat patients with prostate cancer, are based on sampling methods which do not reflect these variations. We found, using state-of-the-art spatial genetic technology to simulate accurate assessment of variation in biopsies, that the current approaches miss important details which could negatively impact clinical decisions. Take home messageVirtual biopsies from spatial transcriptomic analysis of a whole prostate reveal that current genomic risk scores potentially deliver misleading results as they are based on bulk analysis of prostate biopsies and ignore tumour heterogeneity.