Spatial heterogeneity in resources alters selective dynamics in Drosophila melanogaster
Abstract
Environmental features can alter the behaviours and phenotypes of organisms and populations evolving within them including the dynamics between natural and sexual selection. Experimental environmental manipulation, particularly when conducted in experiments where the dynamics of the purging of deleterious alleles are compared, has demonstrated both direct and indirect effects on the strength and direction of selection. However, many of these experiments are conducted with fairly simplistic environments when it is not always clear how or why particular forms of spatial heterogeneity may influence behaviour or selection. Using Drosophila melanogaster, we tested three different spatial environments designed to determine if spatial constraint of critical resources influences the efficiency of natural and sexual selection. We conducted two allele purging experiments to 1) assess the effects of these spatial treatments on the selective dynamics of six recessive mutations, and 2) determine how these dynamics changed when sexual selection was relaxed and the spatial area was reduced. We found that allele purging dynamics depended on spatial environment, however the patterns of purging rates between the environments differed across distinct deleterious mutations. We also found that for two of the mutations, the addition of sexual selection increased the purging rate.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sexual selection does not increase the rate of compensatory adaptation to a mutation influencing a secondary sexual trait in Drosophila melanogaster
C. H. Chandler, A. Mammel, I. Dworkin·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2020
- Reinforcement and selection against migrants maintain sperm competitive and genetic differences among populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura
Dean M. Castillo, Leonie C. Moyle·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·May 20, 2026
- Phenotype-dependent habitat choice is too weak to cause assortative mating between Drosophila melanogaster strains differing in light sensitivity
J. R. Peralta, F. Z. Aoulad, … P. Edelaar·bioRxiv·May 27, 2020
- Variation in Resource Environment Drives Adaptive Divergence in Drosophila melanogaster
Jack K. Beltz, Mark C. Bitter, … PAUL S. SCHMIDT·Evolution LettersPeer-reviewed·Sep 5, 2025
- Socio-ecological context modulates significance of territorial contest competition in Drosophila prolongata
Alessio N. De Nardo, Broti Biswas, … Stefan Lüpold·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Spatial structure imposes sex-specific costs but does not reduce interlocus sexual conflict