PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
No support for white matter microstructural properties and connectivity differences in the combined and inattentive adhd presentations.
Jacqueline F. SaadiD, Kristi R. GriffithsiD, Michael R. KohniD, Taylor A. BraundiD, Simon D. ClarkeiD, Leanne Maree WilliamsiD, Mayuresh S. KorgaonkariD
Abstract
Evidence from functional neuroimaging studies support neural differences between the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) presentation types. It remains unclear if these neural deficits also manifest at the structural level. We have previously shown that the ADHD combined, and ADHD inattentive types demonstrate differences in graph properties of structural covariance suggesting an underlying difference in neuroanatomical organization. The goal of this study was to examine and validate white matter brain organization between the two subtypes using both scalar and connectivity measures of brain white matter. We used both tract-based spatial statistical (TBSS) and tractography analyses with network-based Statistics (NBS) and graph-theoretical analyses in a cohort of 35 ADHD participants (aged 8-17 years) defined using DSM-IV criteria as combined (ADHD-C) type (n=19) or as predominantly inattentive (ADHD-I) type (n=16), and 28 matched neurotypical controls. We performed TBSS analyses on scalar measures of fractional anisotropy (FA), mean (MD), radial (RD), and axial (AD) diffusivity to assess differences in WM between ADHD types and controls. NBS and graph theoretical analysis of whole brain inter-regional tractography examined connectomic differences and brain network organization, respectively. None of the scalar measures significantly differed between ADHD types or relative to controls. Similarly, there were no tractography connectivity differences between the two subtypes and relative to controls using NBS. Global and regional graph measures were also similar between the groups. A single significant finding was observed for nodal degree between the ADHD-C and controls, in the right insula (corrected p=.029). Our result of no white matter differences between the subtypes is consistent with most previous findings. These findings together might suggest that the white matter structural architecture is largely similar between the DSM-based ADHD presentations.
- Citations
- 10
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Field percentile
- top 21%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- White matter microstructure in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic tractography study in 654 individuals
Christienne G. Damatac, Roselyne J. Chauvin, … Emma Sprooten·Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2020
- Reduced fronto-striatal volume in ADHD in two cohorts across the lifespan
Renata Basso Cupertino, Sourena Soheili‐Nezhad, … Emma Sprooten·NeuroImage ClinicalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Exploring Neural Heterogeneity in Inattention and Hyperactivity
Natalia Zdorovtsova, Jonathan Spencer Jones, … Duncan Edward Astle·CortexPeer-reviewed·Apr 26, 2023
- Structural Brain Alterations and Their Association with Cognitive Function and Symptoms in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Families
Wenhao Jiang, Kuaikuai Duan, … Jessica A. Turner·NeuroImage ClinicalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Developmental Differences in White Matter Microarchitecture in Youth with ADHD: Longitudinal Findings from the ABCD Study
L. Nate Overholtzer, Katherine L. Bottenhorn, … Megan M. Herting·Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2026
- Longitudinal changes of ADHD symptoms in association with white matter microstructure: a tract-specific fixel-based analysis
Christienne G. Damatac, Sourena Soheili‐Nezhad, … Emma Sprooten·NeuroImage ClinicalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2022