henhaobio
Sign in
Citations
30
FWCI
2.19
Field percentile
top 13%

Abstract

ObjectiveNeuroimaging studies have associated Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) with altered brain anatomy. However, small and heterogeneous study samples, and the use of region-of-interest and tissue-specific analyses have limited the consistency and replicability of these effects. The present study uses a fully data-driven multivariate approach to investigate alterations in both gray and white matter simultaneously, and capture neuroanatomical features associated with ADHD in two large, independent, demographically different cohorts.\n\nMethodsThe study comprised two ADHD cohorts with structural magnetic resonance imaging data: the Dutch NeuroIMAGE cohort (n=890, average age 17.2 years, discovery sample) and the Brazilian IMpACT cohort (n=180, average age 44.2 years, cross validation sample). Using independent component analysis of whole-brain morphometry images in the NeuroIMAGE cohort, 375 independent components of neuroanatomical variations were extracted and assessed their association with ADHD. Afterwards, ADHD-associated components were cross validated in the Brazilian IMpACT cohort.\n\nResultsIn both discovery (corrected- p=0.020) and validation (p=0.033) cohorts, ADHD diagnosis was significantly associated with reduced brain volume in a component mapping to frontal lobes, striatum, and their interconnecting white-matter tracts. The most pronounced case-control differences were localized in white matter adjacent to the orbitofrontal cortex.\n\nConclusionIndependent component analysis is a sensitive approach to uncover neuroanatomical alterations in ADHD and avoid bias attributable to a priori region-of-interest based methods. Current results provide further evidence for the role of the fronto-striatal circuit in ADHD. The fact that the two cohorts are from different continents and comprising different age ranges highlights the robustness of the findings.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLi '21Saad '21Jiang '20Farid '26Damatac '20Vetter '19
77% semantic matchNeuroscience
Ting Li, Daan van Rooij, Nina Roth Mota+5 more·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry·Mar 30, 2021· 29 citations