Two pathways for thiosulfate oxidation in the alphaproteobacterial chemolithotroph Paracoccus thiocyanatus SST
M. J. Rameez, P. Pyne, S. Mandal, S. Chatterjee, M. Alam, S. Bhattacharya, N. Mondal, J. Sarkar, W. Ghosh
Abstract
Chemolithotrophic bacteria oxidize various sulfur species for energy and electrons, thereby operationalizing biogeochemical sulfur cycles in nature. The best-studied pathway of bacterial sulfur-chemolithotrophy, involving direct oxidation of thiosulfate to sulfate (without any free intermediate) by the SoxXAYZBCD multienzyme system, is apparently the exclusive mechanism of thiosulfate oxidation in facultatively chemolithotrophic alphaproteobacteria. Here we explore the molecular mechanisms of sulfur oxidation in the thiosulfate- and tetrathionate-oxidizing alphaproteobacterium Paracoccus thiocyanatus SST, and compare them with the prototypical Sox process characterized in Paracoccus pantotrophus. Our results revealed the unique case where, an alphaproteobacterium has Sox as its secondary pathway of thiosulfate oxidation, converting [~]10% of the thiosulfate supplied whilst 90% of the substrate is oxidized via a Tetrathionate-Intermediate pathway. Knock-out mutation, followed by the study of sulfur oxidation kinetics, showed that thiosulfate-to-tetrathionate conversion, in SST, is catalyzed by a thiosulfate dehydrogenase (TsdA) homolog that has far-higher substrate-affinity than the Sox system of this bacterium, which, remarkably, is also less efficient than the P. pantotrophus Sox. soxB-deletion in SST abolished sulfate-formation from thiosulfate/tetrathionate while thiosulfate-to-tetrathionate conversion remained unperturbed. Physiological studies revealed the involvement of glutathione in SST tetrathionate oxidation. However, zero impact of the knock-out of a thiol dehydrotransferase (thdT) homolog, together with no production of sulfite as an intermediate, indicated that tetrathionate oxidation in SST is mechanistically novel, and distinct from its betaproteobacterial counterpart mediated by glutathione, ThdT, SoxBCD and sulfite:acceptor oxidoreductase. All the present findings collectively highlight extensive functional diversification of sulfur-oxidizing enzymes across phylogenetically close, as well as distant, bacteria.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Molecular mechanism of sulfur chemolithotrophy in the betaproteobacterium Pusillimonas ginsengisoli
S. Mandal, M. J. Rameez, … W. Ghosh·bioRxiv·Jul 23, 2019
- Beyond SOx: Mining Sulfur Bacteria Produce Less Acid due to Unidentified Enzyme Pathways
Jennifer Gordon·bioRxiv·Dec 4, 2025
- Self-S-sulfonation in a bacterial persulfide dioxygenase mediates thiol persulfide detoxification
Julius O. Campeciño, Sofia Soares Costa, … David P. Giedroc·Communications ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Sep 22, 2026
- A cascade of sulfur transferases delivers sulfur to the sulfur-oxidizing heterodisulfide reductase-like complex
T. S. Tanabe, E. Bach, … C. Dahl·Protein SciencePeer-reviewed·May 15, 2024
- Anaerobic sulfur oxidation underlies adaptation of a chemosynthetic symbiont to oxic-anoxic interfaces
G. F. Paredes, T. Viehboeck, … L. Koenig·bioRxiv·Mar 17, 2020
- Methanotrophs are vigorous H2S oxidizers using a sulfide:quinone oxidoreductase and a ba3-type terminal oxidase
R. A. Schmitz, S. H. Peeters, … A. Pol·bioRxiv·Aug 31, 2022