bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Alternative super-enhancers result in similar gene expression in different tissues
Abstract
Super-enhancers (SEs) are clusters of highly active enhancers, regulating cell type-specific and disease-related genes, including oncogenes1-3. The individual regulatory regions within SEs might be simultaneously bound by different transcription factors (TFs) and co-regulators such as P300, BRD4 and Mediator, which together establish a chromatin environment conducting to effective gene induction4-6. While cells with distinct TF profiles can have different functions, an unanswered question is how different cells control overlapping genetic programmes. Here, we show that the construction of oestrogen receptor alpha (ER)-driven SEs is tissue specific, and both the collaborating TFs and the active SE components are largely differing between human breast cancer-derived MCF-7 and endometrial cancer-derived Ishikawa cells; nonetheless, SEs common to both cell types have similar transcriptional outputs. In the MCF-7 cell line, ER-dominated SEs are also driven by the well-known FoxA1 and AP2{gamma} TFs, as described previously7, whereas in Ishikawa cells, FoxM1, TCF12 and TEAD4 are as important as ER for SE formation. Our results show that SEs can be constructed in several ways, but the overall activity of common SEs is the same between cells with a common master regulator. These findings may reshape our current understanding of how these regulatory units can fine-tune cell functions. From a broader perspective, we show that systems assembled from different components can perform similar tasks if a common functional trigger drives their assembly.
- organism: human
- assay: ChIP-seq
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Super-enhancers are transcriptionally more active and cell-type-specific than stretch enhancers
Aziz Khan, Anthony Mathelier, Xuegong Zhang·EpigeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2018
- Identification of genomic features that uniquely impact estrogen receptor alpha binding and its effects on gene expression in endometrial cancer
Alexandra Richey, Noel Kitchen, … Jason Gertz·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Super-enhancer switching drives a burst in germline gene expression at the mitosis-to-meiosis transition
So Maezawa, Akihiko Sakashita, … Satoshi H. Namekawa·Nature Structural & Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 7, 2020
- A multi-omic dissection of super-enhancer driven oncogenic gene expression programs in ovarian cancer
M. R. Kelly, K. Wisniewska, … H. L. Franco·bioRxiv·Apr 8, 2022
- Transposable elements as tissue-specific enhancers in cancers of endodermal lineage
Konsta Karttunen, Divyesh Patel, … Biswajyoti Sahu·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2023
- Summarizing internal dynamics boosts differential analysis and functional interpretation of super enhancers
Xiang Liu, Bo Zhao, … Mingxiang Teng·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Feb 14, 2022