Sign in
BioinformaticsJournal of Proteome Research
Peer-reviewed journal article

SpaceANOVA: Spatial co-occurrence analysis of cell types in multiplex imaging data using point process and functional ANOVA

Souvik SealiD, Brian NeeloniD, Peggi M. AngeliD, Elizabeth C. O’QuinniD, Elizabeth Goodwin HilliD, Thao VuiD, Debashis GhoshiD, Anand S. MehtaiD, Kristin WallaceiD, Alexander V. AlekseyenkoiD

Abstract

MotivationMultiplex imaging platforms have enabled the identification of the spatial organization of different types of cells in complex tissue or tumor microenvironment (TME). Exploring the potential variations in the spatial co-occurrence or co-localization of different cell types across distinct tissue or disease classes can provide significant pathological insights, paving the way for intervention strategies. However, the existing methods in this context either rely on stringent statistical assumptions or suffer from a lack of generalizability. ResultsWe present a highly powerful method to study differential spatial co-occurrence of cell types across multiple tissue or disease groups, based on the theories of the Poisson point process (PPP) and functional analysis of variance (FANOVA). Notably, the method accommodates multiple images per subject and addresses the problem of missing tissue regions, commonly encountered in such a context due to the complex nature of the data-collection procedure. We demonstrate the superior statistical power and robustness of the method in comparison to existing approaches through realistic simulation studies. Furthermore, we apply the method to three real datasets on different diseases collected using different imaging platforms. In particular, one of these datasets reveals novel insights into the spatial characteristics of various types of precursor lesions associated with colorectal cancer. AvailabilityThe associated R package can be found here, https://github.com/sealx017/SpaceANOVA. Contactsealso@musc.edu Supplementary informationThe supplementary material is attached.

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
14
FWCI
1.91
Field percentile
top 14%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.