henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivCell Biology

Normalizing need not be the norm: count-based math for analyzing single-cell data

S. H. Church, J. L. Mah, G. Wagner, C. Dunn

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Counting transcripts of mRNA is a key method of observation in modern biology. With advances in counting transcripts in single cells (single-cell RNA sequencing or scRNA-seq), these data are routinely used to identify cells by their transcriptional profile, and to identify genes with differential cellular expression. Because the total number of transcripts counted per cell can vary for technical reasons, the first step of standard scRNA-seq workflows is to normalize by sequencing depth, transforming counts into proportional abundances. The primary objective of this step is to reshape the data such that cells with similar biological proportions of transcripts end up with similar transformed measurements. But there is growing concern that normalization and other transformations result in unintended distortions that hinder both analyses and the interpretation of results. This has led to an intense focus on optimizing methods for normalization and transformation of scRNA-seq data. Here we take an alternative approach, by avoiding normalization altogether. We abandon the use of distances to compare cells, and instead use a restricted algebra, motivated by measurement theory and abstract algebra, that preserves the count nature of the data. We demonstrate that this restricted algebra is sufficient to draw meaningful and practical comparisons of gene expression through the use of the dot product and other elementary operations. This approach sidesteps many of the problems with common transformations, and has the added benefit of being simpler and more intuitive. We implement our approach in the package countland, available in python and R. By explicitly considering counts in terms of their measurement process, we avoid and overcome many challenges in modern RNA-seq and open new avenues for the analysis of these data.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISBacher '17Lun '18Lin '20Breda '19Singh '24Salim '22
72% semantic matchGenomics
Rhonda L. Bacher, Li‐Fang Chu, Ning Leng+5 more·Nature Methods·Apr 17, 2017· 282 citations