PLoS GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Common maternal and fetal genetic variants show expected polygenic effects on the probability of being born small- or large-for-gestational-age (SGA or LGA), except in the smallest 3% of babies
Robin N. BeaumontiD, Sarah Joanne Kotecha, Andrew R. WoodiD, Bridget KnightiD, Sylvain P SebertiD, Mark I. McCarthyiD, Andrew Tym HattersleyiD, Marjo‐Riitta JärveliniD, Nicholas John TimpsoniD, Rachel M. FreathyiD, Sailesh KotechaiD
Abstract
Babies born clinically Small- or Large-for-Gestational-Age (SGA or LGA; sex- and gestational age-adjusted birth weight (BW) 90th percentile, respectively), are at higher risks of complications. SGA and LGA include babies who have experienced growth-restriction or overgrowth, respectively, and babies who are naturally small or large. However, the relative proportions within each group are unclear. We aimed to assess the extent to which the genetics of normal variation in birth weight influence the probability of SGA/LGA. We calculated independent fetal and maternal genetic scores (GS) for BW in 12,125 babies and 5,187 mothers. These scores capture the direct fetal and indirect maternal (via intrauterine environment) genetic contributions to BW, respectively. We also calculated maternal fasting glucose (FG) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) GS. We tested associations between each GS and probability of SGA or LGA. For the BW GS, we used simulations to assess evidence of deviation from an expected polygenic model. Higher BW GS were strongly associated with lower odds of SGA and higher odds of LGA (ORfetal=0.65 (0.60,0.71) and 1.47 (1.36,1.59); ORmaternal=0.80 (0.76,0.87) and 1.23 (1.15,1.31), respectively per 1 decile higher GS). Associations were in accordance with a polygenic model except in the smallest 3% of babies (Pfetal=0.0034, Pmaternal=0.023). Higher maternal GS for FG and SBP were associated with higher odds of LGA and SGA respectively (both P<0.01). While lower maternal FG and SBP are generally considered healthy in pregnancy, we found some evidence of association with higher odds of SGA (P=0.015) and LGA (P=0.14) respectively. We conclude that common genetic variants contribute to risk of SGA and LGA, but that additional factors become more important for risk of SGA in the smallest 3% of babies. Naturally low maternal glucose and blood pressure levels may additionally contribute to risk of SGA and LGA, respectively. Author SummaryBabies in the lowest or highest 10% of the population distribution of birth weight (BW) for a given gestational age are referred to as Small- or Large-for-Gestational-Age (SGA or LGA) respectively. These babies have higher risks of complications compared to babies with BW closer to the mean. SGA and LGA babies may have experienced growth restriction or overgrowth, respectively, but may alternatively just be at the tail ends of the normal growth distribution. The relative proportions of normal vs. sub-optimal growth within these groups is unclear. To examine the role of common genetic variation in SGA and LGA, we tested their associations with a fetal genetic score (GS) for BW in 12,125 European-ancestry individuals. We also tested associations with maternal GS (5,187 mothers) for offspring BW, fasting glucose and systolic blood pressure, each of which influences fetal growth via the in utero environment. We found all fetal and maternal GS were associated with SGA and LGA, supporting strong maternal and fetal genetic contributions to birth weight in both tails of the distribution. However, within the smallest 3% of babies, the maternal and fetal GS for BW were higher than expected, suggesting factors additional to common genetic variation are more important in determining birth weight in these very small babies.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 26
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Maternal and fetal genetic contribution to gestational weight gain
Nicole M. Warrington, Rebecca Claire Richmond, … Debbie A. Lawlor·International Journal of ObesityPeer-reviewed·Oct 9, 2017
- Genetic scores explain variation in birthweight that is not captured by easily measured clinical and anthropometric variables
Maneka Haulder, Alice E. Hughes, … Rachel M. Freathy·BMC PediatricsPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2022
- Genome-wide association study of offspring birth weight in 86,577 women highlights maternal genetic effects that are independent of fetal genetics
Robin N. Beaumont, Nicole M. Warrington, … Rachel M. Freathy·Human Molecular GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2018
- Associations of genetic scores for birth weight with newborn size and later Anthropometric traits and cardiometabolic risk markers in South Asians
Suraj Singh Nongmaithem, Robin N. Beaumont, … Giriraj R. Chandak·DiabetesPeer-reviewed·Jan 21, 2022
- Body composition and growth in full-term small for gestational age and large for gestational age Swedish infants assessed with air displacement plethysmography at birth and at 3-4 months of age.
Anna H. Larsson, Peter Ottosson, … Elisabeth Olhager·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 15, 2019
- Common genetic variants with fetal effects on birth weight are enriched for proximity to genes implicated in rare developmental disorders
Robin N. Beaumont, Isabelle K Mayne, … Caroline Fiona Wright·Human Molecular GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 24, 2021