bioRxivImmunologyPreprint
Structural Homology and Electrostatic Potential Comparisons of Epitope Pair Candidates for Molecular Mimicry Triggering of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Ryan Gardner, Joshua Wilkins, Sejal MistryiD, Ramkiran GouripeddiiD, Julio Cesar FacelliiD
Abstract
BackgroundMolecular mimicry, where foreign and self-peptides contain similar epitopes, can induce autoimmune responses. Identifying potential molecular mimics and studying their properties is key to understanding the onset of autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Previous work identified pairs of infectious epitopes (EINF) and T1DM epitopes (ET1D) that demonstrated sequence homology; however, structural homology was not considered. Correlating sequence homology with structural properties is important for translational investigation of potential molecular mimics. This work compares sequence homology with structural homology by calculating the structures and electrostatic potential surfaces of the epitope pairs identified in previous work from our laboratory. ResultsFor each pair of EINF and ET1D, the root mean square deviations (RMSD) were calculated between their predicted structures and their electrostatic potentials. Structures were predicted using the AlphaFold software program. Of the 53 epitope pairs considered here, only 10 did not exhibit any matching (i.e. less than 3 residues overlap). When considering all residues the RMSD ranges from 0.33 [A] to 11.66 [A] with an average of 2.68 [A]. Twenty-two pairs (42%) have RMSD of less than 1.5 [A] and 30 (58%) less than 3 [A]. ConclusionsMost of the EINF/ET1D pairs selected by sequence homology show similar structural and electrostatic distributions, indicating that the EINF may also bind to the same protein targets, i.e. the major histocompatibility complex molecules, for T1DM, leading to molecular mimicry onset of the disease. These findings suggest that searching for epitope pairs using sequence homology, a much less computationally demanding approach, leads to strong candidates for molecular mimicry that should be considered for further study. But structure homology, electrostatic potential calculations and full docking calculations may be necessary to advance the in-silico molecular mimicry predictions, which may be useful to select the most promising candidates for experimental studies.
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Epitopedia: identifying molecular mimicry between pathogens and known immune epitopes
Christian A. Balbin, Janelle Nunez-Castilla, … Jessica Siltberg-Liberles·ImmunoInformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 27, 2023
- Identification of Antigenic Regions Responsible for inducing Type 1 diabetes mellitus
Nishant Kumar, Sumeet Patiyal, … Gajendra P. S. Raghava·bioRxiv·Jul 20, 2022
- Molecular Mimicry Map (3M) of SARS-CoV-2: Prediction of potentially immunopathogenic SARS-CoV-2 epitopes via a novel immunoinformatic approach
Hyunsu An, Jihwan Park·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2020
- A Gut Microbial Peptide and Molecular Mimicry in the Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes
K. Girdhar, Q. Huang, … E. ALTINDIS·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2020
- Can the Human Plastisphere Account for the Rise of Type 1 Diabetes: A Computational Molecular Mimicry Study
Julio Facelli, McKay jones, … Ramkiran Gouripeddi·bioRxiv·Nov 4, 2026
- Interference with MHC class I epitope trimming provides paradoxical protection from autoimmune diabetes
Barbara Bertocci, Emmanuelle Waeckel-Énée, … Peter Van Endert·bioRxiv·Feb 20, 2026