Sign in
NeuroscienceMicrosystems & Nanoengineering
Peer-reviewed journal article

Optimal inter-electrode distances for maximizing single unit yield per electrode in neural recordings

Domokos MeszénaiD, Ward Fadel, Robert A. TothiD, Angelique Christine PaulkiD, Sydney S. CashiD, Ziv M. WilliamsiD, Tamás KissiD, Marcell StippingeriD, Lúcia WittneriD, Richárd FiáthiD, Zoltán SomogyváriiD

Abstract

State-of-the-art high-density multielectrode arrays enable the recording of simultaneous spiking activity from hundreds of neurons. Although significant efforts have been dedicated to enhancing neural recording devices and developing more efficient sorting algorithms, there has been relatively less focus on the allocation of microelectrodes--a factor that undeniably affects spike sorting effectiveness and ultimately the total number of detected neurons. Here, we systematically examined the relationship between optimal electrode spacing and spike sorting efficiency by creating virtual sparser layouts from high-density recordings through spatial downsampling. We assessed spike sorting performance by comparing the quantity of well-isolated single units per electrode in sparse configurations across various brain regions (neocortex and thalamus) and species (rat, mouse, and human). Enabling the theoretical estimation of optimal electrode arrangements, we complement experimental results with a geometrical modeling framework. Contrary to the general assumption that higher electrode density inherently leads to more efficient sorting, both our theoretical and experimental results reveal a clear optimum for electrode spacing specific to species and regions. We demonstrate that carefully choosing optimal electrode distances could yield a total of 1.7 to 3 times increase in spike sorting efficiency. These findings emphasize the necessity of species- and region-specific microelectrode design optimization.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISRossant '15Hilgen '17Yang '25Lefebvre '16Yger '16Garcia '22
77% semantic matchNeuroscience
Cyrille Rossant, Shabnam N Kadir, Dan F. M. Goodman+4 more·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2015