COBT: A gene-based rare variant burden test for case-only study designs using aggregated genotypes from public reference cohorts.
Antoine FavieriD, Stefania Chounta, Alejandro Garcia, Fabienne Jabot‐HaniniD, Xiaoyi CheniD, Nicolas GarceloniD, Anita BurguniD, Manuel HiguerasiD, Agathe GuillouxiD, Alexandre BenmerahiD, Yoann Martin, Katy Billot, Jean‐Michel RozetiD, Isabelle PerraultiD, Valérie Cormier‐DaireiD, Céline HuberiD, Mohamad ZaidaniD, Tania Attié‐BitachiD, Sophie SaunieriD, Antonio RauselliD
Abstract
More than 4000 rare genetic diseases affect 1 in 16 people, yet [~]50% of patients remain undiagnosed after genetic testing. Identifying genotype-phenotype associations is challenged by small cohorts and high clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Rare variant burden tests increase statistical power in case-control studies, but are limited in rare disease research due to the lack of matched controls in retrospective studies. Recently proposed case-only aggregation tests assess the number of individuals with damaging variants under dominant or recessive models, but fail to capture additive effects, hypomorphic variants, or heterogeneous inheritance modes. Here, we present the Case-Only Burden Test (COBT), a gene-based burden test for case-only designs accounting for multiple variants per individual and their putative additive effects. COBT uses a Poisson model to test for excess variants in a gene compared to expectations from general population mutation rates. We validated the models assumptions and goodness-of-fit on a control cohort from the 1000 Genomes Project, where COBT showed low false-positive rates and outperformed alternative case-only tests. Applied to 478 ciliopathy patients, COBT re-identified known causal genes and highlighted novel candidate variants in unsolved cases. COBT enables gene discovery in case-only rare disease cohorts and is available at https://github.com/RausellLab/COBT.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 17th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- CoCoRV: a rare variant analysis framework using publicly available genotype summary counts to prioritize germline disease-predisposition genes
Wenan Chen, Shuoguo Wang, … Gang Wu·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2021
- BinomiRare: A carriers-only test for association of rare genetic variants with a binary outcome for mixed models and any case-control proportion
Tamar Sofer, Jiwon Lee, … Elizabeth D. Schifano·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Jun 12, 2021
- Testing Rare-Variant Association without Calling Genotypes Allows for Systematic Differences in Sequencing between Cases and Controls
Yi-Juan Hu, Peizhou Liao, … Glen Satten·PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 6, 2016
- KS-Burden: Assessing distributional differences of rare variants in dichotomous traits
Robert M. Porsch, Timothy Shin Heng Mak, … Pak Chung Sham·bioRxiv·Jul 13, 2018
- Leveraging Family History in Case-Control Analyses of Rare Variation
Claudia Solís‐Lemus, S. Taylor Fischer, … Michael P. Epstein·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2019
- Deviation from baseline mutation burden provides powerful and robust rare-variants association test for complex diseases
Lin Jiang, Hui Jiang, … Miaoxin Li·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2021